Test my Cablenut Custom file update

[VanBuren]

I made a Version 2 of my custom settings, and now i need testers to compare the new and the old.

here is the new one

VanBuren

[.s1]

hmm i used the T3 option  (changed the MTU to 1500 tho ) lol :p

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 3288 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is:: 401 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.55 second(s)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=4J7DEOVL2



::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 3323 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is:: 406 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.52 second(s)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=N6QFXX9VO

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 3337 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is:: 407 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line:: 60 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.52 second(s)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=N6RGGBD0M



::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is: 346 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 KB)
Upload Speed is: 42 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line: 6 times faster than 56K you can upload 1MB in 24.38 second(s)
Validation Link :: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=BSGUIEBB6

[VanBuren]

hmm i used the T3 option  (changed the MTU to 1500 tho ) lol :p

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 3288 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is:: 401 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.55 second(s)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=4J7DEOVL2



::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 3323 Kbps about 3.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is:: 406 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line:: 59 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.52 second(s)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=N6QFXX9VO

huh?

T3? why did you use that?

No use to compare scores if your not using the files i set a cap at.

btw changed MTU????

T3 has a MTU of 1500 already, its the MSS thats 1460

MSS= MTU -40

VanBuren

[.s1]

T3 has a MTU of 1500 already, its the MSS thats 1460

MSS= MTU -40

VanBuren

whoops my bad, your right :p

and im using the t3 settings because its the only one that makes a diff for me =\

[VanBuren]

T3 has a MTU of 1500 already, its the MSS thats 1460

MSS= MTU -40

VanBuren

whoops my bad, your right :p

and im using the t3 settings because its the only one that makes a diff for me =\

The only diff you will see with T3 settings is burst speed, not the "real" speed your connection has

and i bet on high ping sites you will run even slower with that high RWIN

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/7718

VanBuren

[.s1]

lol im using the largest test and im up to 3.3 mb/s instead of 3.0 , so thoes settings helped me

[FeVeR29]

with T3..
.. Download Stats ..
Connection is 4250 Kbps about 4.3 Mbps (tested with 2992 KB)
Download Speed is 519 kB/s
Tested From http//www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line 76 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 1.97 second(s)
Validation Link http//testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=H60J64AMP

[VanBuren]

omg lol, do not use T3 settings, that file is made for connections with a download and upload speed of around 45 Mbps

use the settings for your connection type and cap


VanBuren

[Marcin541]

I tried the T3 just for the heck of it and i get the same results as i had with my other one lol,

[VanBuren]

I tried the T3 just for the heck of it and i get the same results as i had with my other one lol,

Yea against this site, try downloading on a high ping server, then you will see what i mean and also your flow control wont work very well when your uploading at same time as you downloading.

I didnt make all these files just for fun  

VanBuren

[VanBuren]

I need feedback, does the Version 2 file give faster speed up/down or not, and how does webbrowing work compared to the old files?

VanBuren

[JustinOhioRR]

which one should i use?

Im on RR, WIN98 3000/368 cap i belive, THANKS

[VanBuren]

which one should i use?

Im on RR, WIN98 3000/368 cap i belive, THANKS

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by JustinOhioRR
van, i tried updating, but those are for win2k on the 3k/384 settings, can you make one for win98? it wont let me load it :/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Use the 1500+ file in win 98 folder, but there is no upload tweaks for win 98.

only xp and 2k has that setting

VanBuren

I would change to XP if i was you, alot better TCP stack to get speed

VanBuren

[Microwave]

omg lol, do not use T3 settings, that file is made for connections with a download and upload speed of around 45 Mbps

use the settings for your connection type and cap


VanBuren

   Yeah, Van Buren is correct it may show a difference in burst speeds but I'm postive it slows down speed overall and you'll see a lag when browsing.....
  Microwave

[disturbed]

well i tested it and i like it.....i chose the correct setting and on the 2992KB test i do get like a crazy burst in the begining, and it seems like it finishes the test so fast, but according to the numbers it seems same - although, i like it....feels faster, when downloading im actually able to reach speeds of like 600-700kB/s when comparing to before (~450)