More RAM, more speed - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : smitten remember, testmy.net loves you!  Show your love back and tell your friends about our great community!  We rely 100% on word of mouth advertising, so if you find that the site is useful, tell a friend!  ~ Thanks!  cheesy December 05, 2008, 11:26:21 AM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  Charter Communications  |  Topic: More RAM, more speed Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
  Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan
    Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: More RAM, more speed  (Read 4367 times)
bamatide
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


View Profile
« on: January 09, 2005, 11:59:31 AM »

Just doubled my ram from 256 to 512 and am getting 3200 to 3600 Kbps ever since on a 3000/256 connection. Would addl memory be the reason? If so, I'm going to 1g of memory tomorrow.

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 3425 Kbps about 3.4 Mbps (tested with 1496 KB)
Download Speed is:: 418 kB/s
Tested From:: http://www.testmy.net/
Bottom Line:: 61 times faster than 56K you can download 1MB in 2.45 second(s)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/cgi-bin/get.cgi?Test_ID=BAFCDXPKL

P.S. Just received my charter bill and they upped it an addl 10.00 with no addl services. Maybe they'll get around to giving us something for the 25% increase in the Fairview Hgts Illinois area. Can't say they didn't warn us. Aren't monopolies on HSpd cable great?
Logged
monkhoous
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 31


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2005, 12:10:05 PM »

Thats true I mine use to be 300/30 after I added a ram it was 500/70 than after add more ram to 124 I get 1500/172 Very Happy
Logged
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6117


Cablenut Tweaker


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2005, 12:11:59 PM »

hey bamatide Smile

If you had a very high usage of memory when you was on 256 MB and the computer had to use virutal memory from your hard drive, i can understand that it speeded up abit for you

reading and writing memory to a hardrive is so much slower then from a RAM stick.

a good tip is to defrag your hardrive once in a while, cos you will always have some memory as viritual

VanBuren Smile

Logged

Marcin541
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 503



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2005, 12:16:08 PM »

124 ram? Wow  :whaa:.

Increasing ram will make programs load faster, and your computer will have a place to store them in. Think of it like a shelf. When you open windows, and you have 124 ram, then you will not have as much space left on the shelf. Windows has to constantly clear up the shelf (unload windows) and put in other programs which you wish to open. If you have little ram, windows will cause alot of errors (from my experiance) and you might end up reinstalling it because of a serious error. So if you have 512 ram, the information from the site (testmy.net) will load faster, because not only will you not be unloading as youre loading, but your computers processor speed will increase, because once again, its not unloading anything. Going for 1gig wouldnt make sense unless you have programs that require alot of ram. 512 is the recommended for windows XP, and frankly, i wouldnt be able to work with any less.

Logged

The Reverend
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 644



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2005, 01:14:14 AM »

Hi Marcin541!

I "hear ya" when you are talking about the speed | memory factor.  There was a time when 512 was sufficient for my daughter too.  Yet as she progressed into more memory intensive programs we finally ended up sticking in a full 2 gigs of DDR (Corsair Xtreme 'sticks').  That alone nearly tripled the speed of her XP Home system that uses the very same CPU and motherboard as mine (listed below).  We HAVE to stay 'on the cutting edge' which is expensive, but it pays for itself so no complaints from us! 

I particularly liked your analogy of memory being like a shelf ...may I borrow that analogy for an article I am in the process of writing for testmy.net?  (It's going in the Guides section once completed). 

Also, you are 100% correct about memory taking the load off your CPU.  The more memory you are loaded up with, the fewer CPU cycles that are needed, and hence the faster the system.  My present configuration is absolutely the fastest I've ever sat down behind the keyboard of, yet with a CPU with dual-threading that runs at either 1066GHz or 800GHz ....well geesh, that's fast processing when you need it!  In System Devices, the processor section actually tells you that you have TWO CPUs, because it detects the dual threading.  When you are using programmes that only make use of 1 thread, the Performance Tab in Tash Manager will tell you that you are using 50% of your processor!  lol ...  So it's easy to see and how and where the "speed kick" comes from with any of the Pentium 4 CPUs ...especially if you are using a programme written to take advantage of HT ...like Adobe Photoshop, Illustrator or a high-end graphics programme like Maya 6 Unlimited.  (That's when the system(s) will really 'shine' with an eye to speed).

The two biggest 'robbers' of system speed is memory and hard drive fragmentation.  I grew weary of constantly cruising the network checking everyone for fragmentation, so I bought a multi-user license for Diskeeper 8 Pro.  It has a "Set It And Forget It" mode that keeps all the HDDs in this place at nearly 0% "frag' ...so needless to say I love it!  The Pro version has the additional feature of ensuring that your System Files/Boot Files remain as close to track zero as possible, which greatly increases overall system speed, and reduces the boot time by an astounding amount!  But, Diskeeper is just one of several 'killer' "hands-off" auto-defrag programmes out there.  They all work equally well in my humble opinion - - to include the shareware versions as well!

Lastly, every computer in "the house" has XP-Smoker installed.  (www.xp-smoker.com)  That programme alone will take the average XP box and REALLY speed matters up!  On the same plane of thought, if you visit www.blackviper.com and study up on System Services, you'll find a ton of great info that will also bring about wonderful speed changes along with "beefed up" system security as well.  Out of the 80 'some odd' System Services that most XP machines run by default, most folks only need between 3 - 5 of them.  So shutting down the rest really frees up some System Resources!  It is well worth the time invested to help tweak your system to 'the max'.

I couldn't help but notice that bamatide found that increasing memory from 256 to 512 made a surfing speed difference ...and if he/she went to 1 gig ...they are now going even faster.  heheh....  Everything has a limit yet I haven't found one for memory yet.  I could use more than my present 4gigs without a doubt!

Cheers!

Logged
Print  Pages 1 Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  Charter Communications  |  Topic: More RAM, more speed « previous next »
Jump to:  

    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 
 

 

© 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.106 seconds with 34 queries.