Fastest - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

  



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : Before you post... try a Why don't you search? - Many simple questions have already been answered.  If your query turns up dry then post, we always have people waiting for your questions. azn December 01, 2008, 11:48:32 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  Topic: Fastest Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
   Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan		     Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Topic Tools Search this topic
 Pages 1 2 3  All Go Down
Author
Topic: Fastest  (Read 9997 times)
aerodude
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 218


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: January 08, 2007, 12:08:20 AM »
Quote from: fikester on January 07, 2007, 06:59:15 PM
The way mine worked I had a choice of $399 with no contract or $50 and a 15month contract.......then 69 monthy. Sat equipment already paid for. So unless you need a staitic IP wouldnt see why you would pay $100/month. Again some upgrades may require a re-point....mine did not.


http://go.gethughesnet.com/HUGHES/Rooms/DisplayPages/LayoutInitial?Container=com.webridge.entity.Entity%5BOID%5B71A9F5B422ABCE4886D9492F66B5B589%5D%5D

here use the upgrade link.....http://hughesnet.myway.com/ you will need your site ID to see your offers.

psh im happy with what i got.
lol
Logged
Visit my site! http://www.darkcrux.com
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10207


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 08, 2007, 12:28:44 AM »
Quote from: aerodude on January 08, 2007, 12:08:20 AM
psh im happy with what i got.
lol
I would be also. I have the 6000 also. All the 7000's get is a tad bit more U/L. Not worth another jail sentence contract for 15 months to me. Especially if something better comes along.  Very Happy
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
aerodude
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 218


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: January 08, 2007, 03:00:10 AM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 08, 2007, 12:28:44 AM
I would be also. I have the 6000 also. All the 7000's get is a tad bit more U/L. Not worth another jail sentence contract for 15 months to me. Especially if something better comes along.  Very Happy

haha very true =]]
Logged
Visit my site! http://www.darkcrux.com
granpa
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 921


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 08, 2007, 05:33:56 AM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 08, 2007, 12:28:44 AM
I would be also. I have the 6000 also. All the 7000's get is a tad bit more U/L. Not worth another jail sentence contract for 15 months to me. Especially if something better comes along.  Very Happy
I thought about it and thought about for almost 6 months when I got a notice to upgrade to DW7000 for $199.99 or $49.99/15month sign up. My sentence will be up in a few months and still no other ISP options seen in this years' or next years' future. My ODU is old, but then again some say I am too.  idiot2'S
Logged
Sprint EVDO A | Syntax mb/AMD 2400 - XP Pro - Home Built
Remote G11 Hughes Site Working Since 9/2001
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 08, 2007, 09:13:19 AM »
Quote from: aerodude on January 07, 2007, 06:27:18 PM
Damn.
 I wish i had that.

I have a Intel centrino duo, 2GB RAM, 160 BG HD

Sorry....thought maybe you wasn't familiar with available options or upgrades  Idea



In my area there is little to no chance in DSL coming anytime soon, and as far as Hughes getting the Ka band up......I'm sure it will be at least Nov. before it might, might be available for the brave (its not gonna be a freebie).......just my opinion even a used 7000 off ebay to get better pings, more consistent download speeds and way faster uploads. All for just about the same monthly price, is worth it.

The 6000's do about the same download speeds........at 1am, not during the peak hours, speeds are much different and the uploads are slower than dial up in most cases.
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
ghostmaster
Sophist Member
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1178


Wallowing in my own obscenity...


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 08, 2007, 06:42:16 PM »
The main reason to upgrade to a DW7000, (don't go to a HN7000s, its a f*ckin waste of money), is a much more improved browsing experience.  This is in part due to the web acclerator processing on the modem, and due to lower ping times.  I average about 300ms lower latency going from a 6k to a 7k.

Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=776ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=796ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=801ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=841ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=771ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=721ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=811ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=811ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 721ms, Maximum = 861ms, Average = 805ms
Logged
Suddenlink Premium | 10Mb\768Kb plan.
  You call these bagels???
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 08, 2007, 06:50:40 PM »
Quote from: ghostmaster on January 08, 2007, 06:42:16 PM
The main reason to upgrade to a DW7000, (don't go to a HN7000s, its a f*ckin waste of money), is a much more improved browsing experience.  This is in part due to the web acclerator processing on the modem, and due to lower ping times.  I average about 300ms lower latency going from a 6k to a 7k.

Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=776ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=796ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=801ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=841ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=771ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=861ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=721ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=811ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=811ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 721ms, Maximum = 861ms, Average = 805ms


yes...I remember seeing a 2000ms and 3000ms more than once with the 6 banger.
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
zeddlar
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 39


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2007, 11:22:42 PM »
Well I wouldn't say the HN7000S is a complete waste of money.

::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::
Upload Connection is:: 277 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 34 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/02 - 10:12pm
Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 30.12 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 17.094 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 161.32 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)



::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1485 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 181 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/02 - 10:14pm
Bottom Line:: 26X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.66 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.5 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 41.43 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)



Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Kay.KEVIN>ping www.yahoo.com

Pinging www.yahoo.com [69.147.114.210] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=717ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=765ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=710ms TTL=50
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=699ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 69.147.114.210:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 699ms, Maximum = 765ms, Average = 722ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Kay.KEVIN>ping www.pcpitstop.com

Pinging www.pcpitstop.com [64.29.201.21] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=676ms TTL=243
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=720ms TTL=243
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=690ms TTL=243
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=700ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 64.29.201.21:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 676ms, Maximum = 720ms, Average = 696ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Kay.KEVIN>ping www.testmy.net

Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=771ms TTL=48
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=726ms TTL=48
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=726ms TTL=48

The download speed is by far the worst I have had since I had the dish remounted and peaked properly. You will find my pastes elsewhere on this boar and see it is normally 2.5 during off peak times and 1.6 to 2.0 during peak times and my pings are never worse than these aside form an occasional rogue reply.
Logged
Hughesnet small buissness package/ HN7000S Modem/ .98 dish and 2 watt Radio/ AMC9 (83w.)/ Computer specs, AMD Athlon 64 3000+/ 2GB G-Skill high speed gaming Ram/ 80 GB HDx2 + 40 GB hd/ Gigabyte Geoforce 6600GT Graphics and SB Live audio.
kol
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 421



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 03, 2007, 05:25:29 PM »
have the dw6000 heil to ur masta- evil

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1550 Kbps about 1.6 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Download Speed is:: 189 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/03 - 4:37am
Bottom Line:: 27X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.42 sec
Tested from a 1496 kB file and took 7.906 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 47.62 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-Z08GF5B2Q
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; Windows-Media-Player/10.00.00.3990)
Logged
Sprint Ev-do Rev. A Computer- Hp Pavilion a000 Upgraded with 2.5 Gigs Of Ram, 750 Gigs of Storage Windows Vista Ultimate
NoteBook- hp dv6748us


ghostmaster
Sophist Member
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1178


Wallowing in my own obscenity...


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 03, 2007, 06:02:43 PM »
Quote from: zeddlar on April 02, 2007, 11:22:42 PM
Well I wouldn't say the HN7000S is a complete waste of money.

:::::::::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..:::::::::::::::::
Upload Connection is:: 277 Kbps about 0.3 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 34 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/02 - 10:12pm
Bottom Line:: 5X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 30.12 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 17.094 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 161.32 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)



:::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1485 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 181 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/02 - 10:14pm
Bottom Line:: 26X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.66 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.5 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 41.43 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)



Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Kay.KEVIN>ping www.yahoo.com

Pinging www.yahoo.com [69.147.114.210] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=717ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=765ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=710ms TTL=50
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=699ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 69.147.114.210:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 699ms, Maximum = 765ms, Average = 722ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Kay.KEVIN>ping www.pcpitstop.com

Pinging www.pcpitstop.com [64.29.201.21] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=676ms TTL=243
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=720ms TTL=243
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=690ms TTL=243
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=700ms TTL=243

Ping statistics for 64.29.201.21:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 676ms, Maximum = 720ms, Average = 696ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Kay.KEVIN>ping www.testmy.net

Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=771ms TTL=48
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=726ms TTL=48
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=726ms TTL=48

The download speed is by far the worst I have had since I had the dish remounted and peaked properly. You will find my pastes elsewhere on this boar and see it is normally 2.5 during off peak times and 1.6 to 2.0 during peak times and my pings are never worse than these aside form an occasional rogue reply.


The main difference is that your are on a SOHO plan, with a larger dish and transmitter.  You would get the same speeds with a DW7000.
Logged
Suddenlink Premium | 10Mb\768Kb plan.
  You call these bagels???
tm24ns58
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 144


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 04, 2007, 02:04:09 PM »
I have the consumer home plan and I am very happy with my system. It continues to please me every day.


::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1485 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 181 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/04 - 1:00pm
Bottom Line:: 26X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.66 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 16.5 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 41.43 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-PZAUTBQHR
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3) Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
Logged
HN7000S, Pro plan, 127 West, 1410 MHz
upsurfer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: April 06, 2007, 02:22:35 PM »
::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1996 Kbps about 2 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 244 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/06 - 1:21pm
Bottom Line:: 35X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 4.2 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 12.281 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 90.1 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-OW3FQAR6Z
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

I'll keep my 7000s until something better comes along.

Hopefully it's sooner than later.................
Logged
XP PRO  SP2  Intel Pentium 4  3.60 GHz, 1.0GB RAM, Radeon x800SE  Pro Plus Account DW7000S W/out ISP
Linksys EZXS55W router with 2 connected
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10207


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 06, 2007, 03:40:40 PM »
My 6000 for the most part still surf fine, so it will be a keeper for a while.  Twisted Evil
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
upsurfer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 06, 2007, 08:25:05 PM »
By something better, I mean DSL or something like that, not just another box.

:::::::::::::::::.. Download Stats ..:::::::::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 2143 Kbps about 2.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 262 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/06 - 7:27pm
Bottom Line:: 37X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 3.91 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 11.437 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 104.29 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-RZJ7DWP93
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::
Upload Connection is:: 162 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 20 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/06 - 7:29pm
Bottom Line:: 3X faster than 56K 1MB Upload in 51.2 sec
Tested from a 579 kB file and took 29.312 seconds to complete
Upload Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 52.83 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-IYMEADZJB
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)

« Last Edit: April 06, 2007, 08:29:47 PM by upsurfer » Logged
XP PRO  SP2  Intel Pentium 4  3.60 GHz, 1.0GB RAM, Radeon x800SE  Pro Plus Account DW7000S W/out ISP
Linksys EZXS55W router with 2 connected
Truckinslim
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 47



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2007, 07:05:05 AM »
::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 1523 Kbps about 1.52 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Download Speed is:: 186 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 190 Kbps about 0.2 Mbps (tested with 386 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 23 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Server 1)
Test Time:: 2007/04/07 - 6:03am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-Y7PMHGSI9
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-R9CGMAYXT
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
 smiley
Logged
John
Print  Pages 1 2 3  All Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  Topic: Fastest « previous next »
Jump to:  

 
    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 		  

 

 © 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.201 seconds with 53 queries.