How is your ping times? - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

  



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : Before you post... try a Why don't you search? - Many simple questions have already been answered.  If your query turns up dry then post, we always have people waiting for your questions. azn January 08, 2009, 01:43:10 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  Topic: How is your ping times? Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
   Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan		     Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Topic Tools Search this topic
 Pages 1 2 3 4  All Go Down
Author
Topic: How is your ping times?  (Read 10767 times)
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2007, 07:57:58 AM »
Hmm...They improved for a member on the broadbandreports boards. So I guess so far it is mixed results here. Do you have a HN700s or a DW7000? Because I hear that the new HN700s's tend to get better ping times than the other modems.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2007, 08:09:37 AM »
DW7000
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2007, 06:37:51 PM »
Anybody out there with a HN700S that wouldn't mind posting results? I am dieing to see if it gets better pings than the DW7000 lol. uglystupid2 cheesy shocked
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2007, 06:49:07 PM »
Mine is not an S but here is what I have got tonight:


Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=983ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=731ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=711ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=739ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=898ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=798ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=747ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=715ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=822ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=850ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=710ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 706ms, Maximum = 983ms, Average = 784ms
Control-C
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2007, 08:09:23 PM »
Here is why I am thinking about getting Hughes...

My ping times tonight on Wildblue:

Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2063ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1932ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1671ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1419ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1743ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2399ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2210ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1899ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1672ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1335ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2381ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2963ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1356ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2057ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1669ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1600ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2129ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2269ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2012ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1148ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1749ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1267ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2227ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1492ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2026ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1148ms, Maximum = 2963ms, Average = 1867ms
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10314


Old Glory


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2007, 08:15:34 PM »
Wont that mean all new equipment again?  Rolling Eyes
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2007, 08:21:33 PM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 25, 2007, 08:15:34 PM
Wont that mean all new equipment again?  Rolling Eyes

Unfortunately yes, but if this does not get better soon I can not live with these ping times. This takes what little ounce of gaming I had and flushes it down the toilet.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2007, 08:34:39 PM »
are the pings like that on all the WB beams?
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2007, 08:38:43 PM »
Quote from: fikester on January 25, 2007, 08:34:39 PM
are the pings like that on all the WB beams?

Beam 40 is worse than normal for some reason tonight. But all of the beams are averaging at a minimum of 1100-1300ms. It has been like this since November. No matter what time of the day you will never average below 1100.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10314


Old Glory


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2007, 09:14:39 PM »
Probably just a lot of traffic.  smiley6600
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 25, 2007, 09:17:55 PM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 25, 2007, 09:14:39 PM
Probably just a lot of traffic.  smiley6600

The thing is though is Beam 40 has always been one of the very light loaded Beams. I have never seen a Peak Time slow down since October of 05. So I think it is probably more along the lines of Wildblue doing more tweaking than actual loading. Hopefully their tweaking will end with good performance and I can stay with what I got. But I am not going to hold my breath.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2007, 09:38:33 PM »
Surely WB will get the firmware fixed soon? Hughes is tweaking with firmware as well.
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 25, 2007, 09:44:48 PM »
Quote from: fikester on January 25, 2007, 09:38:33 PM
Surely WB will get the firmware fixed soon? Hughes is tweaking with firmware as well.

They don't talk like they are planning on it. What they are claiming is they prioritized http and put everything else on the bottom. Although for some odd reason my browsing got worse after the "upgrade"...Hmm...Also if they wanted to actually change what they had set up then could they not just revert back to the old firmware? Personally I think they are morons for messing with it in the first place. My service was as advertised 24/7 and ping times STAYED below 600 and rarely went into the low 600s. I mean if it aint broke don't fix it!!!!
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
granpa
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 926


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: January 26, 2007, 08:49:08 AM »
Pinging 67.18.179.85 with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=825ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=725ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=753ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=702ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 702ms, Maximum =  825ms, Average =  751ms
Logged
Sprint EVDO A | Syntax mb/AMD 2400 - XP Pro - Home Built
Remote G11 Hughes Site Working Since 9/2001
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: February 02, 2007, 10:13:55 AM »
Quote from: Siryak on January 25, 2007, 09:44:48 PM
They don't talk like they are planning on it. What they are claiming is they prioritized http and put everything else on the bottom. Although for some odd reason my browsing got worse after the "upgrade"...Hmm...Also if they wanted to actually change what they had set up then could they not just revert back to the old firmware? Personally I think they are morons for messing with it in the first place. My service was as advertised 24/7 and ping times STAYED below 600 and rarely went into the low 600s. I mean if it aint broke don't fix it!!!!

WB will have the new sat operational at 111 degrees by April '07, looks like improvements may be just ahead  Idea
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Print  Pages 1 2 3 4  All Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  Topic: How is your ping times? « previous next »
Jump to:  

 
    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 		  

 

 © 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.12 seconds with 54 queries.