How is your ping times? - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

  



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : Have an idea that will make testmy.net better?  Click here to post it!  We love to hear feedback, user feedback like yours have helped build testmy.net over the years.. true story wink December 01, 2008, 10:36:40 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  Topic: How is your ping times? Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
   Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan		     Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Topic Tools Search this topic
 Pages 1 2 3 4 All Go Down
Author
Topic: How is your ping times?  (Read 10323 times)
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« on: January 19, 2007, 06:50:28 PM »
I am curious to see the ping times of Hughesnet. As you all may no Wildblue's pings are in the craper. I am hoping that they will straighten this mess out and I can stay with them, but if they don't do something soon I am going to haft to find something else. I used to game on Xbox Live, and even those pesky FPS worked!!! They were not perfect, but they worked and was highly enjoyable. But with the pings below nothing works. How steady are your pings? Could somebody maybe post a lengthy ping test? TY for any and all help.

Pinging yahoo.com [66.94.234.13] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1182ms TTL=47
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1227ms TTL=47
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1704ms TTL=46
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1141ms TTL=48
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=2415ms TTL=46
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1173ms TTL=48
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1181ms TTL=46
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=2399ms TTL=47
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1170ms TTL=46
Reply from 66.94.234.13: bytes=32 time=1140ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 66.94.234.13:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1140ms, Maximum = 2415ms, Average = 1473ms
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 9769


HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2007, 07:28:32 PM »
that looks pretty good for Hughesnet except for the 2399ms one
Logged
Bird Fan
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1087


This is not Kelly Kapoor story hour!


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2007, 07:30:22 PM »
Quote from: dlewis23 on January 19, 2007, 07:28:32 PM
that looks pretty good for Hughesnet except for the 2399ms one

He's on Wildblue...

Mine:

Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=850ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=764ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=991ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=911ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 764ms, Maximum = 991ms, Average = 879ms
Logged
SBC Yahoo DSL : 3 / 512

"The world is like a ride at an amusement park.  And when you choose to go on it, you think its real because thats how powerfull our minds are.  And the ride goes up and down and round and round.  It has thrills and chills, and its very brightly coloured , and its very loud and its fun, for a while.  Some people have been on the ride for a long time, and they begin to question - is this real, or is this just a ride?  And other people have remembered, and they come back to us.  They say, 'Hey! Dont worry, dont be afraid, ever, because, this is just a ride.'
~ Bill Hicks RIP
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2007, 07:54:28 PM »
Hughes

Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=829ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=749ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=770ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=793ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 749ms, Maximum = 829ms, Average = 785ms
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
ghostmaster
Sophist Member
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1178


Wallowing in my own obscenity...


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 19, 2007, 07:56:47 PM »
Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=986ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=755ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=735ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=774ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=695ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=765ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=685ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=804ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=785ms TTL=47
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=715ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 685ms, Maximum = 986ms, Average = 769ms
Logged
Suddenlink Premium | 10Mb\768Kb plan.
  You call these bagels???
aerodude
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 218


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2007, 03:05:14 PM »


Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=773ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=687ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=678ms TTL=51
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=753ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 678ms, Maximum = 773ms, Average = 722ms

C:\Documents and Settings\Owner.laptop001>
Logged
Visit my site! http://www.darkcrux.com
aerodude
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 218


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2007, 03:06:50 PM »
wait.. you can play xbox live with hughesnet?
Logged
Visit my site! http://www.darkcrux.com
ghostmaster
Sophist Member
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1178


Wallowing in my own obscenity...


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2007, 03:25:37 PM »
You can on some games, but I wouldn't recommend it for FPS or real time action games.
Logged
Suddenlink Premium | 10Mb\768Kb plan.
  You call these bagels???
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2007, 04:16:34 PM »
Quote from: ghostmaster on January 22, 2007, 03:25:37 PM
You can on some games, but I wouldn't recommend it for FPS or real time action games.

If you have Xbox Live give Call of Duty 3 a try. Best network code I have ever seen, and it plays great on satellite.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10207


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2007, 11:44:29 PM »
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes ->bytes=32 time=1081ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 750 bytes ->bytes=750 time=2661ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1125 bytes ->bytes=1125 time=1977ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1312 bytes ->bytes=1312 time=1543ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1406 bytes ->bytes=1406 time=1684ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1453 bytes ->bytes=1453 time=1842ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1476 bytes -> ..fragmented
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1465 bytes ->bytes=1465 time=1641ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1470 bytes ->bytes=1470 time=1703ms TTL=49
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1473 bytes -> ..fragmented
Pinging [67.18.179.85] with 1472 bytes ->bytes=1472 time=1730ms TTL=49

I guess I am average.  cool
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
Blunted 2
Sophist Member
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2704


Fios 20/20 - OOL 15/2


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2007, 11:46:55 PM »
how can that play fine with about a second of delay?
Logged
Vote my video's
My Halo 3 Videos

My FTP Downloads

My Live video Stream
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10207


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2007, 11:51:05 PM »
Quote from: Blunted 2 on January 22, 2007, 11:46:55 PM
how can that play fine with about a second of delay?
I heard 2 second jet lag.  wink Heck if I know.  *shrug*
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
luisdarisa
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2007, 02:26:02 PM »
My Pings  azn







DW7000 / 1.98 / Plan B. Internet / G11
Logged
DW7000 /G11 / BUSINESS INTERNET SERVICE PLAN / INSTALATION PLACE HONDURAS
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2007, 03:53:08 PM »
Could someone on HN maybe run a regular ping(preferably long) and then run this ping in the background---> ping yahoo.com -t -l 800
What that does is it puts the system under a load thus if HN is like Wildblue(used to be) the pings will improve whenever it is under a load. But if somebody would do that for me it would be greatly appreciated.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2007, 11:01:57 PM »
Pings did not improve while the other ping run in the background for me.  Arrow


Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1629ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1530ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1748ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1907ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1578ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1829ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1568ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1608ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1518ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1590ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1827ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1500ms TTL=51
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1798ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1577ms TTL=52
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1567ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1958ms TTL=53
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=800 time=1689ms TTL=52

Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
    Packets: Sent = 43, Received = 43, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1450ms, Maximum = 2087ms, Average = 1658ms
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 24, 2007, 07:57:58 AM »
Hmm...They improved for a member on the broadbandreports boards. So I guess so far it is mixed results here. Do you have a HN700s or a DW7000? Because I hear that the new HN700s's tend to get better ping times than the other modems.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2007, 08:09:37 AM »
DW7000
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 25, 2007, 06:37:51 PM »
Anybody out there with a HN700S that wouldn't mind posting results? I am dieing to see if it gets better pings than the DW7000 lol. uglystupid2 cheesy shocked
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 25, 2007, 06:49:07 PM »
Mine is not an S but here is what I have got tonight:


Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=983ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=731ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=711ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=739ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=898ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=798ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=747ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=715ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=822ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=850ms TTL=50
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=710ms TTL=50

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 706ms, Maximum = 983ms, Average = 784ms
Control-C
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2007, 08:09:23 PM »
Here is why I am thinking about getting Hughes...

My ping times tonight on Wildblue:

Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2063ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1932ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1671ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1419ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1743ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2399ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2210ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1899ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1672ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1335ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2381ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2963ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1356ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2057ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1669ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1600ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2129ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2269ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2012ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1148ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1749ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1267ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2227ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1492ms TTL=46
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2026ms TTL=46

Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1148ms, Maximum = 2963ms, Average = 1867ms
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10207


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 25, 2007, 08:15:34 PM »
Wont that mean all new equipment again?  Rolling Eyes
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 25, 2007, 08:21:33 PM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 25, 2007, 08:15:34 PM
Wont that mean all new equipment again?  Rolling Eyes

Unfortunately yes, but if this does not get better soon I can not live with these ping times. This takes what little ounce of gaming I had and flushes it down the toilet.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 25, 2007, 08:34:39 PM »
are the pings like that on all the WB beams?
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: January 25, 2007, 08:38:43 PM »
Quote from: fikester on January 25, 2007, 08:34:39 PM
are the pings like that on all the WB beams?

Beam 40 is worse than normal for some reason tonight. But all of the beams are averaging at a minimum of 1100-1300ms. It has been like this since November. No matter what time of the day you will never average below 1100.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
tommie gorman
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 10207


"OLD GLORY"


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: January 25, 2007, 09:14:39 PM »
Probably just a lot of traffic.  smiley6600
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 25, 2007, 09:17:55 PM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 25, 2007, 09:14:39 PM
Probably just a lot of traffic.  smiley6600

The thing is though is Beam 40 has always been one of the very light loaded Beams. I have never seen a Peak Time slow down since October of 05. So I think it is probably more along the lines of Wildblue doing more tweaking than actual loading. Hopefully their tweaking will end with good performance and I can stay with what I got. But I am not going to hold my breath.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 695


This is my cat!


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: January 25, 2007, 09:38:33 PM »
Surely WB will get the firmware fixed soon? Hughes is tweaking with firmware as well.
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish |  using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7  |  Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: January 25, 2007, 09:44:48 PM »
Quote from: fikester on January 25, 2007, 09:38:33 PM
Surely WB will get the firmware fixed soon? Hughes is tweaking with firmware as well.

They don't talk like they are planning on it. What they are claiming is they prioritized http and put everything else on the bottom. Although for some odd reason my browsing got worse after the "upgrade"...Hmm...Also if they wanted to actually change what they had set up then could they not just revert back to the old firmware? Personally I think they are morons for messing with it in the first place. My service was as advertised 24/7 and