EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue - testmy.net resource / tool
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
Home
Download Test
Test Your Download Speed
Test Download AND Upload
Upload Test
Test Your Upload Speed
Test Upload AND Download
Community Forum
Community Forum Home
» Log-In
» Register
Internal Search
Google Powered Search
Computer & Net Guides
ISP Discussion
Forum Sitemap
Member List
Forum Stats
Forum Help and Info
Calendar & Birthdays
Database Stats
Host Stats
Member Stats
Share Score
Misc Tools
Conversion Calc.
Speed Chart
Conversion Table
Create a Test
Share Score
Automatic Test
Forum Archive
RSS and Blog Feeds
Score Database
trace/ping/whois/DNS
Wallpapers
Tweak Guide
!! Forum Search !!
!! Google Search !!
TMN Detailed Sitemap
News
News Home
Join
Theme
See Theme List
America the Beautiful
Blacken
Dark Blood Red
Blue
Blue Black Box
Blue Gray
Brown
Christmas
Dark Blue
ekaf
GL Series (default)
Gray Shades
Original Feel
Green
Greenhouse
Greenhouse Gray
Halloween Theme
Orange
Purple Darkness
Red/pink
Red 'n Black
TurkeyDay!
» Neuron (Default)
Neuron Black
Rise (New!)
Click to read why...
News
:
remember, testmy.net loves you! Show your love back and tell your friends about our great community! We rely 100% on word of mouth advertising, so if you find that the site is useful, tell a friend! ~ Thanks!
January 08, 2009, 01:37:32 PM
testmy.net Broadband
|
Provider Discussion and Reviews
|
North American Providers (Including Canada)
|
Sprint Nextel Corporation
| Topic:
EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
Recommended Tests
Test PC
Performance:
Click here to run a free Performance Scan
Test PC
Stability:
Click here to run a free Registry Scan
Note: The links above are sponsored links
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Topic Tools
Search this topic
Pages
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Author
Topic: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue (Read 21126 times)
Siryak
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 559
I didn't do it!!!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #120 on:
February 11, 2007, 09:38:03 AM »
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 08:30:02 AM
Theres my first post to her about EVDO......guess since I'm looking at the big picture and not posting any different because unity is a female? Had it been me that posted the exact same lingo about getting the Sprint deal, the post would have been attacked and flamed at just as most are. The pings look better than sat at the moment, but would honestly think they will increase during peak usage time.My point about the cost is the way the deal reads if she didn't buy the special router.....then she is paying 59/month for each line, this is what I wanted to clarify.....and if so then around 150-180 month would not be compred to Hughes home account lets compare it to a business plan or small office at least!
Gorman
....its seems odd to me you cant justify $10/month considered an upgrade from the old 6000 to a newer 7000 or 7000s for better pings/ more consistent performance/double or better uploads speeds....but yet now EDVO is far superior regardless. When WB first come out a 2yr contract was " bad", "not good"...Hughes 15 months "terrible" ......now all of a sudden 2yr contract is not even a concern.
Siryak
...was it not you who posted about how when you first got WB how good it was (pings 550-675ms) and you gamed on it etc....now its no good junk (pings 1400-2200ms). Surprised your still using WB and not just plugged in the phone line? Interesting how it could possibly be different now from then
The only reason why I still have it is because EVDO is not available yet, and also I think it might get better whenever WB-1 is online. Also the user that posted before with the high pings on EVDO was obviously in a bad spot otherwise the pings will be satellite easily. The fact of the matter is EVDO is and always will be better than satellite. I have seen much higher pings on Hughes and Wildblue than I will ever see on EVDO. Whenever you are browsing guess what...PINGS MATTER!!! Satellite always has and ALWAYS will be a dial-up alternative and NOTHING more.
To grandpa you are exactly right on signal fluctuations being the source of the speed fluctuations. I have read on the evdoforums multiple cases where people had speeds that were either consistently slow or fluctuated and was fixed by simply adding an antenna. I have also seen people getting a good 1.4mb in some cases. Also the upload on EVDO (rev a) stomps satellite. I have seen a user post as high as 900k.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 695
This is my cat!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #121 on:
February 11, 2007, 10:27:50 AM »
What we are comparing here is 3 connections at around $150/month for the 3 needed connections ...this would easily pay for the business plan on Hughes or Small office. The EVDO may very well be better in some aspects but having to pay 150/month plus taxes and fees for 3 users to me is out of the question? If you only bought one card and paid for one line what would the speed be with 3users using at once in the house and how would other users at home get online while the card holder took it with them? Not for me if each user needs a card at $60/month!
http://www.evdoforums.com/thread4836.html
I guess if you need a mobile connection that bad....thats what you will need to get. I will deal with the sat latency in the exchange for the need to spend the same amount of money for equipment then $55-70month per user and still have pings higher than DSL or cable.
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish | using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7 | Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 559
I didn't do it!!!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #122 on:
February 11, 2007, 10:43:27 AM »
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 10:27:50 AM
What we are comparing here is 3 connections at around $150/month for the 3 needed connections ...this would easily pay for the business plan on Hughes or Small office. The EVDO may very well be better in some aspects but having to pay 150/month plus taxes and fees for 3 users to me is out of the question? If you only bought one card and paid for one line what would the speed be with 3users using at once in the house and how would other users at home get online while the card holder took it with them? Not for me if each user needs a card at $60/month!
http://www.evdoforums.com/thread4836.html
I guess if you need a mobile connection that bad....thats what you will need to get. I will deal with the sat latency in the exchange for the need to spend the same amount of money for equipment then $55-70month per user and still have pings higher than DSL or cable.
Jeffwalker just got through showing you that it can do just as good as DSL if the signal is good.
Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=42ms TTL=54
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=54
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=54
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=39ms TTL=54
Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 42ms, Average = 39ms
I have seen many DSL accounts that could not even get latency like that. Also you keep saying well you could have a business Hughesnet account for that price. Can you take your Hughesnet with you wherever you go? Can you play online games with your Hughesnet? Can you use VOIP with your Hughesnet? Can you download all you want with your Hughesnet? Can you browse secure sites quickly and easily with your Hughesnet? NO...Also you don't haft to pay $55-70 a month per user. You can simply get an EVDO router and share it just like you share your satellite connection. The only reason unity got a card per user is because she needed to take her cards with her.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
dn0
Expert
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 1181
Finally Football Season
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #123 on:
February 11, 2007, 10:56:33 AM »
Those pings are EVDO Rev. A and look nice.
I don't have Rev. A here yet, will be nice when it comes along.
I hate to chime in this late, but I think Unity's point is the freedom of 3 separate cards, and it sounds like the $ is not a big issue.
Glad to see your happy, unitychild.
If all i had was my EVDO connection, I could live with that.
I would trade my cable modem to move out to an acreage away from town somewhere (been thinking about it).
Logged
Download Connection is:: 13858 Kbps about 13.86 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1692 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 1052 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 128 kB/s
D-Validation Link::
http://testmy.net/stats/id-3H8V14MSA
U-Validation Link::
http://testmy.net/stats/id-FT5ZNJCXB
fikester
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 695
This is my cat!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #124 on:
February 11, 2007, 11:04:23 AM »
For one...from what I have been reading the average ping expected for this system is around 200ms which is no doubt better then any sat provider regardless of plan. 150/month which is needed for 3 users to be mobile in the same home to me is hideous.
Sirlak....was it you who said "WB pings in the 500-600ms were doable to game on" at one point?
http://www.evdoforums.com/thread4836.html
According to this link the router would allow sharing of the 3 users in home.....(and what would the speed be shared with 3 users on?) but at this point would be use less when the card holder pulled the card to go mobile.
I'm not going to spend 150/month for my 3 users I don't care if the pings are 5ms coast to coast and speeds are 20MB up and down 24/7/365 guaranteed money back. This is not for all of us.....
Oh and can you run a server on EVDO at 150/month?..... or is that against policy
Seen the same hype when WB rolled out, now look 2000ms pings
I think unity's big issue was the FAP and she said she was not going to spend 99 for the small office to get the 500MB bucket or the 179 for the business plan for the 1250MB bucket....because of the price. I did tell her glad she was happy with the EDVO ....in my opinion its a little steep in price for a family plan (3-4 users) and get the benefit of mobile usage with the allowed average pings.
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish | using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7 | Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 559
I didn't do it!!!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #125 on:
February 11, 2007, 12:01:11 PM »
What makes you think that sharing an EVDO connection would be any slower than sharing a sat connection with 3 users? You can spend $60 a month for 3 users and get better service than what you are getting with sat. Can you run a server on sat.?...or is that against policy
The point I am trying to make here is EVDO is the better option no matter what the case. If you have a good EVDO signal it is always going to be better than sat. Also you spin the whole if I go mobile then the house has no internet. So leave the card in there!!! It is not look you are losing functionality by it. Not unless you take that dish with you(doubt it).
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
fikester
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 695
This is my cat!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #126 on:
February 11, 2007, 12:42:46 PM »
Download is slower than sat with one user so I'm sure it would slower with 3users when comparing what comes with the $60plan ......so when taking away the mobile capability by getting only one card the only gain is somewhat better pings....as the equipment cost are at or above sat cost as well as the 2yr contract. Unless you park under the tower, average pings are expected to be 200ms or even higher with EDVO. As for hardcore gamers 150-200ms may very well still complain?
- somewhat better pings(still higher than DSL or cable on average)
- equipment cost high
- extreme high cost to be portable and keep service at the home for family use
- unlimited plan no FAP with Sprint
Gains over sat...slightly better pings, not any faster speeds, no FAP?
So I guess Sirlak that wasn't you who said gaming was "doable" on WB?
Seems so hilarious how when a male mentioned spending the same money on a business plan for service.....attack!
Quote from: tommie gorman on January 06, 2007, 02:57:28 PM
Twice the speed for 4 times the money, it would have to be real important to need that that bad. Definitely not for just surfing.
Way too high.
and so gramps your saying your really not getting these speeds?
Quote from: granpa on January 07, 2007, 11:51:24 AM
:::::::
::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
:::::::
Download Connection is:: 1655 Kbps about 1.7 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 202 kB/s
Tested From::
http://testmy.net/
(Server 2)
Test Time:: 2007/01/07 - 10:48am
Bottom Line:: 29X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 5.07 sec
Tested from a 2992 kB file and took 14.811 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: Awesome! 20% + : 57.32 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
D-Validation Link::
http://testmy.net/stats/id-WG57MEISU
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.1) Gecko/20061204 Firefox/2.0.0.1
and I have you and gorman both say.... "FAP is not an issue for me"
and gorman say "upload is not important to me".
Guess if the lady said the tweaks were useless as other web sites do say for the self hosted systems.....that would be the end of that game too?
My point is even it were avaible for me I would not jump on a 2yr contract and spend hundreds of dollars with out looking at the big picture. Obviously to me its not better than cable,dsl, or fios
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish | using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7 | Linksys WRT54G
Siryak
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 559
I didn't do it!!!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #127 on:
February 11, 2007, 01:01:52 PM »
Even with 3 users it would still not be slower than sat. If you don't believe me go to wildblue.cc or evdoforums.com and ask the former sat folks. Also the download on the Sprint $60 is much faster than the download on the Hughesnet $60 plan. The 800k she was getting is actually much slower than the average Sprint customer. Pretty muchly every one I see is 1.2Mbps. Also you don't haft to be under the tower to get pings better than 200ms. Not sure where you pulled those numbers, but they are wrong. All you need is a good signal and it can get DSL latency. A good signal can be acquired with the proper equipment(usually just an external antenna). I am the one that said gaming "was" doable on WB. But it is not anymore. Plus it is "doable", that doesn't mean that it is great. It will NEVER be as good as EVDO.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
granpa
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 926
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #128 on:
February 11, 2007, 01:42:22 PM »
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 12:42:46 PM
Download is slower than sat with one user so I'm sure it would slower with 3users when comparing what comes with the $60plan ......so when taking away the mobile capability by getting only one card the only gain is somewhat better pings....as the equipment cost are at or above sat cost as well as the 2yr contract. Unless you park under the tower, average pings are expected tobe 200ms or even higher with EDVO. As for hardcore gamers 150-200ms may very well still complain?
- somewhat better pings(still higher than DSL or cable on average)
- equipment cost high
- extreme high cost to be portable and keep service at the home for family use
- unlimited plan no FAP with Sprint
Gains over sat...slightly better pings, not any faster speeds, no FAP?
So I guess Sirlak that wasn't you who said gaming was "doable" on WB?
Seems so hilarious how when a male mentioned spending the same money on a business plan for service.....attack!
and so gramps your saying your really not getting these speeds?
and I have you and gorman both say.... "FAP is not an issue for me"
and gorman say "upload is not important to me".
Guess if the lady said the tweaks were useless as other web sites do say for the self hosted systems.....that would be the end of that game too?
My point is even it were avaible for me I would not jump on a 2yr contract and spend hundreds of dollars with out looking at the big picture. Obviously to me its not better than cable,dsl, or fios
It doesn't matter because you just can't go on-line for free.
Yes ping times are good.
Equipment cost is the WRTG54G3G-ST. I was given a price from Sprint of $199.99, it's a wireless router that will accept a wireless card. The card and router are portable on Sprint network. One brand of card works out to be free.
Hughes for new is, not sure now but was $499.00 but had rebates and 15 month contract. Being Moto-Sat much much more.
Sprint unlimited, yes
Gains, better pings, speeds near same maybe better than Sat with same price plan and no FAP.
Did I say I'm not getting those speeds, where? Your doing the checking and posting. Sat varies every second and I said I'm curious to see what I could do with EVDO. As far as FAP I never have been in my 6 years using Hughes 2-way.
Now we know you won't spend hundreds of dollars but did you put out money for new Sat in the beginning, if so there was a contract wasn't there?
I would be willing to try it when my 7000 commitment runs out for the trial period and if wasn't as good I'd return it. Each location can react differently, revision A may not be there and signal quality is a variable. Thats why I'm researching, so far I have no complaints about Hughes at all. Any problems were sorted out and resolved and my 2-way system has been great for 6 years.
Logged
Sprint
EVDO
A
| Syntax mb/AMD 2400 - XP Pro -
Home Built
Remote G11 Hughes Site Working Since 9/2001
tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 10314
Old Glory
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #129 on:
February 11, 2007, 04:44:42 PM »
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 08:30:02 AM
Gorman
....its seems odd to me you cant justify $10/month considered an upgrade from the old 6000 to a newer 7000 or 7000s for better pings/ more consistent performance/double or better uploads speeds....but yet now EDVO is far superior regardless. When WB first come out a 2yr contract was " bad", "not good"...Hughes 15 months "terrible" ......now all of a sudden 2yr contract is not even a concern.
fikester
...for some reason you want to act like Bird Fan and argue with everyone just for the sake of being right.
She has made an adult decision with her husband to do this, and for some unknown reason it just does not sit well with you. So she has to take what her family has done and listen to and do what you want.
WHY?
So it is not what you would have done.
SO?
I have also decided not to go into another 15 month (ball and chain) contract with someone who should have a robbers mask on to get what? Better pings, a bit better ( very low by industry standards ) U/L increase to only upload a pic or e-jmail or 2. I do not game, I don't really care that much, you are 100% correct. I do not give a damn.
And it is not necessary to pay $10 for an upgrade, $50 + contract. The home 700/128 is an upgrade from what I have.
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 08:30:02 AM
Theres my first post to her about EVDO......guess since I'm looking at the big picture and not posting any different because unity is a female? Had it been me that posted the exact same lingo about getting the Sprint deal, the post would have been attacked and flamed at just as most are.
I am backing her because she is a new member, not because she is female. You can ask water on this, I treat all alike. She never did attack you in any way. But you continue to have her defend her and her husbands decision to do this, because it does not sit well with what you would have done. Why should she post a ping test, just to make you happy? I want her to not be afraid of posting here, just because some members on here have a chip on their shoulder. Now just quit, please.
At least now she can post in a better section away from hughes where there are buttheads. (fikester and bird fan.) Don't make personal attacks and there won't be any. Now are we done flaming yet?
I have really had it. Youknow what, you are the only 2 I have ever had issues with since I first got on this forum in a year and a half.
I have even argued religion with a Muslim and finally shook hands and walked away friends. I argued with Revolutionaries from Puerto Rico and shook hands and walked away friends.
But not you 2 for some reason. You both remind me of an ex-wife. At least she left with her divorce papers.
«
Last Edit: February 11, 2007, 04:55:28 PM by tommie gorman
»
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!
"an old country hick from america"
Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
unitychild
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 51
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #130 on:
February 11, 2007, 09:33:57 PM »
Wow! I kind of feel like I shouldn't have ever posted here in the first place! lol This is the last time I'm going to defend my decision... I just posted because this forum was exactly what I was searching for when I decided to go the route I chose. I didn't want to cause any arguments!:( I am happy with what I have, and I don't mind paying for it(I realize that it is a lot of money, but only $50 more than I was paying for sat and t-mobile, and now my husband and I are BOTH mobile and happy). I go to grad school online, I do 3D art and sell through a few 3D stores online, I download programs that I buy online that are fairly HUGE, my husband games online, we won't get FAPd now... this is totally worth the extra $50 a month to us. If we didn't need to be mobile, we definitely would have tried the router, but I do wonder if the speeds would be lower with 3 computers hooked up to one card. We have 3 desktops in the house, but 2 are not hooked up to the internet right now... but the router may be an option in the future, just for the desktops. I will be keeping the laptops mobile. Why have a laptop that you can't take with you(and everything I do is on the internet). lol
Anyway, thanks to those who gave me great information and advice, I really appreciate it!:)
Steph
Logged
tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 10314
Old Glory
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #131 on:
February 11, 2007, 10:38:39 PM »
My apologies unitychild, it appears since
Hughes
got included in the title that it got a bit messed up. I am glad you and your husband got what you both wanted. I think that is wonderful. This type of goings on it usually not tolerated, please do not go away because of it. You had every right in this EVDO forum to speak what you wanted, after all that is the title on the door. Not hughes net. So please come back if ever you have any more problems. We will try to deal with them in a more gentlemanly manner as we usually do. Thank you for your time.
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!
"an old country hick from america"
Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
fikester
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 695
This is my cat!
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #132 on:
February 11, 2007, 11:55:17 PM »
Take a look back gorman to post #88 ...simply told untiychild glad she like it, but I did not see where it wan any faster than sat according to the speed test logs. Then mr post to post lights the flame torch with post #89
Quote from: tommie gorman on February 10, 2007, 05:41:30 PM
Umm...no 2 second jet lag signal.
(to the satelite and back.) Why dial-up almost keeps up with us.
Seems odd to me your always bragging your 1500k sat speeds, now all if a sudden are the same as dial-up
Always posting about these special tweaks for these self-hosted systems......this is why you don't like me and bird cause we point these contradictions out
No fikester is not a mod or a news anchor, but yes gorman I have been a member longer ......and will not
bow down to your attacking my posts with remarks covered by hints of joking. No....I don't hardly think you treat all alike (you make special post toward important members/mods on here)....then name call and try to attack post from some of us. (another example off the top of my head) a post of mine about anti virus programs reviews....mins later bam "look at the date that article was written" bla bla bla. I will not bow down to you or stoop to your childish level of name calling.
I think gorman you need now to deflate as your head is getting quite large....
What exactly is not usually tolerated here....its not me name calling, cursing etc..?
Logged
DW7000 | Horozions1 | 1390.0 MHz |RSL 85 | ACP 89 | .74M dish | using windows XP SP2 | pro account (dynamic IP) | RC 4/5 | IE7 | Linksys WRT54G
granpa
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 926
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #133 on:
February 12, 2007, 04:40:48 AM »
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 11:55:17 PM
Take a look back gorman to post #88 ...simply told untiychild glad she like it, but I did not see where it wan any faster than sat according to the speed test logs. Then mr post to post lights the flame torch with post #89
fikester,
I can't see what you got all upset about with post #88 and 89.
#88
Quote from: fikester on February 10, 2007, 04:54:51 PM
Glad you like it, at least unless something changes you wont need to watch usage.....but I don't see where it is any faster.
#89
Quote from: tommie gorman on February 10, 2007, 05:41:30 PM
Umm...no 2 second jet lag signal.
(to the satelite and back.) Why dial-up almost keeps up with us.
Yes your post #88 was nice but tommie's #89 flamed you, I don't see it. All he mentioned that the ping test for dial-up almost keeps up to satellite. So that brought this,
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 11:55:17 PM
Seems odd to me your always bragging your 1500k sat speeds, now all if a sudden are the same as dial-up
Gee, you called tommie a "tard". Well for what I could see after #89 you kept up about the price "unitychild" paid for her Sprint. I don't see where it is any concern yours. Granted you did say "you" wouldn't pay it and thats your choice. I'm not angry at you and I don't think anyone else is but you kept harping on what "she' paid, and this
Quote from: fikester on February 11, 2007, 10:27:50 AM
What we are comparing here is 3 connections at around $150/month for the 3 needed connections
I don't believe from reading all the posts anyone was doing that comparing but only you since you mentioned money in 8 posts. To me it looked like a parent scolding their child for what was bought. My self and others I believe are trying to discuss this to get comparisons with EDVO (land wireless) and Hughesnet/Wildblue (sat wireless) and not how many connections one bought. That's it plain and simple and I hope I don't get any retaliation for doing so.
Everyone, thanks for your help from another tired Sat user that owns 7 satellite dishes.
Granpa
Logged
Sprint
EVDO
A
| Syntax mb/AMD 2400 - XP Pro -
Home Built
Remote G11 Hughes Site Working Since 9/2001
jeffwalker9999
TMN Friend
Offline
Gender:
Posts: 518
Yep - You can say I'm a Nerd & Geek
Re: EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
«
Reply #134 on:
February 12, 2007, 08:04:08 AM »
Please get back on topic >>>>>>>>>>
edit of a quote >>>>
Can you take your Hughesnet with you wherever you go?
Can you play online games with your Hughesnet?
Can you use VOIP with your Hughesnet?
Can you download all you want with your Hughesnet?
Can you browse secure sites quickly and easily with your Hughesnet?
NO
Wow! I kind of feel like I shouldn't have ever posted here in the first place! lol This is the last time I'm going to defend my decision... I just posted because this forum was exactly what I was searching for when I decided to go the route I chose. I didn't want to cause any arguments!
I am happy with what I have, and I don't mind paying for it(I realize that it is a lot of money, but only $50 more than I was paying for sat and t-mobile, and now my husband and I are BOTH mobile and happy).
I go to grad school online, I do 3D art and sell through a few 3D stores online, I download programs that I buy online that are fairly HUGE, my husband games online, we won't get FAPd now... this is totally worth the extra $50 a month to us.
If we didn't need to be mobile, we definitely would have tried the router, but I do wonder if the speeds would be lower with 3 computers hooked up to one card.
We have 3 desktops in the house, but 2 are not hooked up to the internet right now... but the router may be an option in the future, just for the desktops. I will be keeping the laptops mobile. Why have a laptop that you can't take with you(and everything I do is on the internet). lol
Anyway, thanks to those who gave me great information and advice, I really appreciate it!:)
arguments!:( never should of been started ( period )
You did the correct thing
You asked about service and equipment and got answers and got what will work for you
Please don't let a few Jerks or people keep you from using testmy.net
Members helping others is what it should be all about
not causing or starting problems
EVDO has to be better than satellite - do to multiple factors
( my 3 cents ) Jeff
Logged
Cancer and Stroke Survivor and High Tech Nerd
[/br]
over 8 gigs of shared software via peer to peer networking - join our netwok - you won't believe the collection we have and are sharing
http://web-freebies.com/Join_Our_P2P_Network
Pages
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
testmy.net Broadband
|
Provider Discussion and Reviews
|
North American Providers (Including Canada)
|
Sprint Nextel Corporation
| Topic:
EVDO-A vs Hughesnet/ WildBlue
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Main Forum
-----------------------------
=> General Discussion
=> New Members
=> PC Security
===> Antivirus & Firewalls
===> Spyware & Malware
===> Viruses & Scams
===> Security Threats
=> Show off your scores!
=> Make it Faster...
=> HELP!
===> HELP! With Other Stuff
===> HELP! With Tests
===> HELP! With Forum
===> Programming and Website Help
=====> HTML
=====> PHP
=====> PERL
=====> Server Help
===> Networking and Hardware
===> Overclocking
===> Linux Help
=> News
===> testmy.net News and Updates
=> Online Gaming Discussion
===> Requests
===> America's Army
===> Battlefield
===> Call Of Duty 4
===> Counter-Strike 1.6
===> Counter-Strike : Source
===> Day of Defeat : Source
===> Diablo
===> F.E.A.R
===> Ghost Recon
===> Halo 2
===> Lineage 2
===> Quake
===> Rainbow Six 3
===> World of Warcraft
===> Tribes 2
===> Unreal Tournament
=> Graphics, Sigs and Pictures
===> Test Board
=> Guides
=> Got any ideas to make testmy.net better?
=> Off Topic Discussion
===> Politics & More
-----------------------------
Provider Discussion and Reviews
-----------------------------
=> Add a Provider
=> All Dial-up
=> North American Providers (Including Canada)
===> Canadian Providers
=====> teksavvy.com Canada
=====> xplornet.com Canada
=====> Persona Internet
=====> Rogers Communications
=====> Shaw Communications
=====> Sympatico (Bell Canada)
===> Adelphia Communications
===> ALLTEL Communications
===> AOL
===> AT&T
=====> SBC Global
=====> BellSouth
===> Cable One
===> Cavalier Telephone cavtel.net
===> cebridge.net
===> CenturyTel
===> Charter Communications
===> Clearwire
===> Comcast Cable Communications
===> Country Cablevision
===> Covad communications
===> Cox Communications
===> DMAX Puerto Rico
===> EarthLink
===> EMBARQ
===> Frontier Online
===> HughesNet (DIRECWAY)
=====> DW4000 Information
=====> DW6000 Information
=====> DW7000 Information
===> Insight Broadband
===> Mediacom Communications
===> Midcontinent Communications
===> mycingular.net
===> Namesco/NDO (ndo.com)
===> onelinkpr.net Puerto Rico
===> Optimum Online
===> Qwest Communications
===> RCN
===> RoadRunner (Time Warner Cable)
===> seidata.com
===> sigecom.net
===> SkyWay USA
===> Speakeasy
===> Sprint Nextel Corporation
===> Starband
===> Suddenlink
===> SureWest Communications
=====> SureWest Communications FIOS
===> SusCom - Susquehanna Communications
===> TDS - Telephone and Data Systems, Inc
===> Transedge.com
===> Verizon Online
===> Verizon Online FIOS
===> Wave Broadband
===> Wide Open West
===> Wildblue Communications, Inc
=> World Providers (Non-North American)
===> African Providers
===> Asian and Middle Eastern Providers
=====> Asian Providers
=====> Centennial
=====> Digitel
=====> PLDT myDSL
=====> Sify Broadband
=====> Streamyx
=====> Smart Bro (Wi-fi)
===> Australian Providers
=====> Digiplus
=====> Optusnet
=====> Telstra Bigpond
===> UK and European Providers
=====> Bredbandsbolaget
=======> Bredbandsbolaget Fiber
=======> Bredbandsbolaget ADSL, VDSL
=====> Virgin.net (old NTL)
=====> Tiscali
===> Central/South American Providers
-----------------------------
Miscellaneous
-----------------------------
=> Archives
===> Announcements
=> Public Polls
===> Not on index
Print
Advanced search
Loading...
testmy.net's forum is proudly
Powered by SMF
|
SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
© 1999-2008 testmy.net -
Contact
-
Legal
-
Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.171 seconds with 53 queries.