HN7000S Switch - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

  



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : Have you seen the guides section?  It's an always growing section with tons of cool guides for subjects you might not even know about, check it out... it's a good read azn January 08, 2009, 01:48:17 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  DW7000 Information  |  Topic: HN7000S Switch Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
   Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan		     Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Topic Tools Search this topic
 Pages 1 2  All Go Down
Author
Topic: HN7000S Switch  (Read 4630 times)
Private
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 84


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2007, 08:38:45 PM »
Yes I am still on satmex5 freq 970. I don't see how my spped could improve being on same bird and freq I understant most DW7000 are on SatMax6. Also I cannot use Firfox anymore get the message, The proxy server is refusing connections all the time. Anyone know a way around this. How can I change my signature?


Quote from: tommie gorman on February 09, 2007, 07:22:56 PM
I thought they were supposed to hold close to the speed during the day is what I heard from so many as to why they were so much better to have instead of the 4000 or 6000!  sad I might as well stay with the 6000, and no extra cost. At least that is what I have heard so much of on here from others.  tickedoff

That is horrible private, I get those speeds already.
Yes Iam still on satmexr anf freq.970
Quote from: tommie gorman on February 09, 2007, 07:22:56 PM
I thought they were supposed to hold close to the speed during the day is what I heard from so many as to why they were so much better to have instead of the 4000 or 6000!  sad I might as well stay with the 6000, and no extra cost. At least that is what I have heard so much of on here from others.  tickedoff

That is horrible private, I get those speeds already.
Logged
HN7000S Satellite Satmax 5, Receive Frequency 970 Pro Account Windows XP,
Private
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 84


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2007, 08:47:05 PM »
Your connection is: 656 Kbps or 0.7 Mbps
You downloaded at: 80 kB/s
You are running: 11 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 12.8 second(s)
Member Ident:Username:Private CompID:612858725
Test Time:: 2007/02/09 - 7:41pm
Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; iOpus-I-M; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; IEMB3; IEMB3)
Test ID: BLXINSHPQ (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)
Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 62.12 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com)
This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 37.359 seconds to complete
I could get between 1 and 1.3 meg with my DW4000 after peak time. Will try to get Hughes to switch me to  SatMex 6. I hope.
Logged
HN7000S Satellite Satmax 5, Receive Frequency 970 Pro Account Windows XP,
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2007, 09:21:30 PM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on February 09, 2007, 07:45:57 PM
So private, did they put you an a different bird than what you were on then? If so I definately don't want to switch. Mine has not ever been bad.  angel

From what I hear from the Hughesnet users is if it ain't broke don't fix it. Because whenever you switch you are always risking either an improvement and then there is that "other" result.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10314


Old Glory


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 09, 2007, 09:42:26 PM »
Quote from: Siryak on February 09, 2007, 09:21:30 PM
From what I hear from the Hughesnet users is if it ain't broke don't fix it. Because whenever you switch you are always risking either an improvement and then there is that "other" result.
Shhh....we do not say that ( "other" ) word around here now.  Rolling Eyes

I don't remember anyone ever getting good speeds on Sat Mex.  Neutral
Logged
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
zeddlar
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 39


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2007, 07:21:56 PM »
I just read this in another string so I figured I might add it here. Go into interntet options, connections, lan settings and get rid of the proxy settings there and click automaticly detect proxy. I am not sure what you will have to do about firefox and if that will fix it or not.

Your connection is: 386 Kbps or 0.4 Mbps
You downloaded at: 47 kB/s
You are running: 7 times faster than 56K and can download 1 megabyte in 21.79 second(s)
Member Ident:Username:zeddlar CompID:615722116489
Test Time:: 2007/04/17 - 6:17pm
Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
Test ID: 5TL7WA63O (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)
Diagnosis ^info^: May need help : running at only 36.83 % of your hosts average (direcpc.com)
This was tested from a 2992 kB file and took 63.563 seconds to complete


Your connection is: 223 Kbps or 0.2 Mbps
You uploaded at: 27 kB/s
You are running: 4 times faster than 56K and can upload 1 megabyte in 37.93 second(s)
Member Ident:Username:zeddlar CompID:615722116489
Test Time:: 2007/04/17 - 6:18pm
Test Browser and OS info: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)
Test ID: CL5TQ4ZU0 (if this is a screenshot go to testmy.net to see if this is fake)
Diagnosis ^info^: Awesome! 20% + : 108.41 % faster than the average for host (direcpc.com)
This was tested from a 579 kB file and took 21.25 seconds to complete


I'm afraid this won't help you be enthused to much but this was takin during peak time and during moderate rainfall so taking that into account I guess it isnt to bad. Also my pings stay under 750 aside from an occasional server sputter and thas jusy one ping in a string of 20.
Logged
Hughesnet small buissness package/ HN7000S Modem/ .98 dish and 2 watt Radio/ AMC9 (83w.)/ Computer specs, AMD Athlon 64 3000+/ 2GB G-Skill high speed gaming Ram/ 80 GB HDx2 + 40 GB hd/ Gigabyte Geoforce 6600GT Graphics and SB Live audio.
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2007, 07:44:34 PM »
Quote from: zeddlar on April 17, 2007, 07:21:56 PM
I'm afraid this won't help you be enthused to much but this was takin during peak time and during moderate rainfall so taking that into account I guess it isnt to bad. Also my pings stay under 750 aside from an occasional server sputter and thas jusy one ping in a string of 20.

Arg...I didn't ever think I would say this...But I would kill for those ping times. cry

Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1163ms, Maximum = 1708ms, Average = 1338ms
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
Private
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 84


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 18, 2007, 04:50:18 PM »
Quote from: tommie gorman on February 09, 2007, 07:45:57 PM
So private, did they put you an a different bird than what you were on then? If so I definately don't want to switch. Mine has not ever been bad.  angel
Tommie when you change modems  you stay on same bird and Transponder. I requested the re point of dish. They also changed radio transmitter on the dish. Hughes paid for the service call. I have been talking with Excutive Customer Care trying to get slow speed resolved. They are great to work. I just had a big problem finding out who to contact.
Logged
HN7000S Satellite Satmax 5, Receive Frequency 970 Pro Account Windows XP,
Print  Pages 1 2  All Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  HughesNet (DIRECWAY)  |  DW7000 Information  |  Topic: HN7000S Switch « previous next »
Jump to:  

 
    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 		  

 

 © 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.107 seconds with 39 queries.