RoadRunner problems - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

  



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : Have you seen the guides section?  It's an always growing section with tons of cool guides for subjects you might not even know about, check it out... it's a good read azn December 05, 2008, 01:52:11 AM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  RoadRunner (Time Warner Cable)  |  Topic: RoadRunner problems Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
   Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan		     Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Topic Tools Search this topic
 Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: RoadRunner problems  (Read 3892 times)
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« on: March 11, 2007, 06:55:06 PM »
I belive that Im paying for 5 Mbps/384 Kbps roadrunner but having downloads closer to 3500Kbps and 33% packet loss is disturbing.  I might be capped at 4Mb but If RoadRunner does not have a 4Mb service something strange is going on.


Tracing route to testmy.net [67.18.179.85]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1     *        *        *     Request timed out.
  2    12 ms    13 ms     *     cpe-76-176-208-1.san.res.rr.com [76.176.208.1]
  3    13 ms    11 ms     *     76.176.0.33
  4    15 ms    15 ms     *     24-48-219-173.losaca.adelphia.net [24.48.219.173]
  5    20 ms    17 ms     *     prt24.vnnyca2-rtr1.socal.rr.com [76.167.2.15]
  6    28 ms    25 ms     *     tge1-3-0.tustca1-rtr1.socal.rr.com [76.167.2.66]
  7    27 ms    23 ms     *     GIG2-0.LSANCA1-RTR1.socal.rr.com [66.75.161.157]
  8    27 ms    24 ms     *     te-3-3.car2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.78.195.189]
  9    24 ms    31 ms     *     ae-31-55.ebr1.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.68.102.158]
 10    25 ms    34 ms     *     ae-1-100.ebr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net [4.69.132.6]
 11    59 ms    70 ms     *     ae-3.ebr2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.132.78]
 12    58 ms    60 ms     *     ae-24-52.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.68.122.48]
 13    59 ms    60 ms     *     THE-PLANET.car4.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.71.122.2]
 14    61 ms    54 ms     *     te9-2.dsr01.dllstx3.theplanet.com [70.87.253.14]
 15    60 ms    54 ms     *     vl42.dsr02.dllstx4.theplanet.com [70.85.127.91]
 16    75 ms    73 ms     *     gi1-0-1.car17.dllstx4.theplanet.com [67.18.116.69]
 17    57 ms    57 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 18    56 ms    59 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 19    59 ms    61 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 20    57 ms    60 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 21    59 ms    60 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 22    60 ms    57 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 23    60 ms    56 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 24    60 ms    57 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 25    56 ms    55 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 26    56 ms    60 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 27    56 ms    59 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 28    56 ms    60 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 29    60 ms    60 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
 30    59 ms    56 ms     *     55.b3.1243.static.theplanet.com [67.18.179.85]
Trace complete.

Pinging testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 55ms, Maximum = 59ms, Average = 57ms
______________________________________________
So, to conclude...
Does RR have a 4Mb cap?
What do you think about loosing one third of packets on trace route?
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2007, 07:08:10 PM »
Did you have Adelphia before this?
Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2007, 07:12:29 PM »
Yep
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2007, 07:16:51 PM »
Thats why sad

From what I know...users who were on Adelphia's  4/384 and migrated over to RR are still seeing 4/384 instead of RR's equivalent tier of 5/384 or whatever is standard in that specific area.

Also I have heard that they are working out the kinks of this massive takeover and once thats done...there will be a more uniform way of placing users with specific speeds, so in other words, you will be seeing RR speeds instead of Adelphia speeds smiley
Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2007, 07:18:57 PM »
Ok ty DjVaGGo,
I guess I sould be happy with reaching 99.3% of my capped line  Smile
Whats up with my trace routes?
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2007, 07:23:12 PM »
They look ok icon_thumleft

And no problem smiley
« Last Edit: March 11, 2007, 07:28:10 PM by DjVaGGo » Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2007, 07:31:21 PM »
Only 2 out of every 3 packets makes it to the destination.  Or am i miss reading?
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2007, 07:36:10 PM »
Quote from: Blako on March 11, 2007, 07:31:21 PM
Only 2 out of every 3 packets makes it to the destination.  Or am i miss reading?


No you're right...it does look weird that the third one doesn't go but as long as each hop along the way responds, your ok

Btw....when you do a trace route to another site..do you get the same thing...with 33% packet loss?
Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2007, 07:50:59 PM »
google.com = 33% loss
yahoo.com = 33% loss
dogpile.com = 33% loss
msn.com =  100% loss
pcpitstop.com = 33% loss
nytimes.com = 100% loss
flowers.com = 33% and 66% loss
breadstick.com = 100% loss
Very Happy pizzahut.com = 33% loss
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2007, 08:11:57 PM »
Quote from: Blako on March 11, 2007, 07:50:59 PM
google.com = 33% loss
yahoo.com = 33% loss
dogpile.com = 33% loss
msn.com =  100% loss
pcpitstop.com = 33% loss
nytimes.com = 100% loss
flowers.com = 33% and 66% loss
breadstick.com = 100% loss
Very Happy pizzahut.com = 33% loss

Try resetting both your modem and router if you have one

PS...nice choice of sites :haha:
Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2007, 11:20:09 PM »
There is a slight difference but nearly nothing after restarting router and modem.  Is it possable that msn.com for example does not want anyone doing a trace route to them for ... security reasons?  There are definitly some good reasons to not alow traceroutes to "important" servers.
police

Getting 3600 - 3980Kbps on a connection capped at 4Mbps is fine by me.  Now, if the cap was moved to 5Mbps I would reach the RR average of 4700Kbps.
angel
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2007, 09:11:37 PM »
Quote from: Blako on March 11, 2007, 11:20:09 PM
There is a slight difference but nearly nothing after restarting router and modem.  Is it possable that msn.com for example does not want anyone doing a trace route to them for ... security reasons?  There are definitly some good reasons to not alow traceroutes to "important" servers.
police

Getting 3600 - 3980Kbps on a connection capped at 4Mbps is fine by me.  Now, if the cap was moved to 5Mbps I would reach the RR average of 4700Kbps.
angel

Yes there are some sites that do not allow ICMP either one way or both ways.

But about your speeds, depending on your area and the level of competition it could go even higher than 5Mbps at one point wink
Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
Blako
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 340



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 13, 2007, 02:40:01 PM »
Quote from: DjVaGGo on March 12, 2007, 09:11:37 PM
...depending on your area and the level of competition it could go even higher than 5Mbps at one point wink
Can you explain please?
Logged
The fastest path on a race track is one where you turn the least.
Example of a Hyperplane: a three dimensional plane in the fourth dimension.
RoadRunner advertised = (10Mb?/1Mb?)  Cap at = (10.24Mb/1.024Mb) Best = (9808kb/976kb)  Avg. = (8000+kb/900+kb)
Internet caps found at http://192.168.100.1/diagnostics_page.html Terayon modem password "icu4at!"
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2202


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 13, 2007, 04:55:41 PM »
Quote from: Blako on March 13, 2007, 02:40:01 PM
Can you explain please?

Well if you happen to live in a Verizon area...and they plan on rolling out FIOS....well lets just say you will be noticing faster speeds soon
Logged


My CPU: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=192303
mudmanc4
Global Moderator
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4512


✠


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 18, 2007, 09:48:25 AM »
  EEEEEkkk, just getting worse all the time .

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 789 Kbps about 0.8 Mbps (tested with 748 kB)
Download Speed is:: 96 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (Server 2)
Test Time:: 2007/03/18 - 8:45am
Bottom Line:: 14X faster than 56K 1MB Download in 10.67 sec
Tested from a 748 kB file and took 7.77 seconds to complete
Download Diagnosis:: May need help : running at only 16.74 % of your hosts average (rr.com)
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-CERI98S65
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.10) Gecko/20060911 SUSE/1.5.0.10-0.2 Firefox/1.5.0.10
Logged
Yea, it's a Mac

In confusion there is profit
Print  Pages 1 Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  RoadRunner (Time Warner Cable)  |  Topic: RoadRunner problems « previous next »
Jump to:  

 
    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 		  

 

 © 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.132 seconds with 54 queries.