New Satillite Speed? - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : uglystupid2 Don't look stupid, make sure you keep up-to-date with our rules, please read rules, click here  police January 07, 2009, 04:46:03 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  Wildblue Communications, Inc  |  Topic: New Satillite Speed? Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
  Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan
    Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: New Satillite Speed?  (Read 3645 times)
Private
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 84


View Profile
« on: April 13, 2007, 01:04:35 PM »

Anyone on the new bird? If so please show speed test. I am thinking of switching to Wild Blue from Hughes or is WB just as bad?
Thanks
Logged

HN7000S Satellite Satmax 5, Receive Frequency 970 Pro Account Windows XP,
TimPawlak
News Anchor
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1540


Comcast 20/2 --- Telia 100/75


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2007, 01:50:48 PM »

it sucks, i was at my friends hosue that was using it last night... it gets like 900 ms pings and doesnt download for crap..
Logged


Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2007, 11:22:26 AM »

900ms...that would be nice. More like it averages 1300ms(+) and has pings going upward of 3000ms. This applies to the new bird as well.
Logged

Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD

tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10313


Old Glory


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2007, 11:57:20 AM »

Satelite is satelite, pretty much. It is impossible to overcome it's problems. It will always have lag.  Evil or Very Mad
Logged

IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
W4DRA
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2007, 04:37:24 PM »

My speeds have been great this month for some reason.
I just hope they keep up. I am on Wildblue beam 45.
Dave



Logged

Sprint Broadband Mobile
Which at times is a pain in the butt.
Very unstable and unpredictable.
Very seldom get advertised speeds.
tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10313


Old Glory


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 16, 2007, 08:32:02 PM »

Thats good,it is always nice to hear someone is happy with their satelite. There are times it rocks. (and then there are times it does not.)  wink
Logged

IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 16, 2007, 08:34:07 PM »

Thats good,it is always nice to hear someone is happy with their satelite. There are times it rocks. (and then there are times it does not.)  wink

There is? :huh:
Logged

Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD

tommie gorman
TMN Post Whore
Sophist Member
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 10313


Old Glory


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 16, 2007, 08:36:36 PM »

Actually I had some very unusual high speeds for a bit myself. It was running over 3MB. Only lasted a month or two.

So you never know.  Very Happy
Logged

IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM !!!

"an old country hick from america"

Sprint EVDO Rev. A * AMD 64 3500+ 2.2 GHz cpu Ram 2GB/XP Home * TCP Optimizer
zeddlar
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 39


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2007, 07:50:43 AM »

I switched from Wildblue to Hughes at the first of the year because they have there pings capped. If anyone is getting 900 ms pings I am not sure how because the last I knew the best anyone could get was around 1100  and stayed closer to 1500 to 3000 for me. If you are not going to be using secure sights or any gaming or VPN where lag matters then you would do good with wildblue. Otherwise you are better off with hughes. If you do switsh to wildblue go with you local electric coop if possible to get it and not through Wildblue themselves as the customer service will usually be much better that way. Also I have been reading about alot of good experiances with people going through Dish Network to get set up.
Logged

Hughesnet small buissness package/ HN7000S Modem/ .98 dish and 2 watt Radio/ AMC9 (83w.)/ Computer specs, AMD Athlon 64 3000+/ 2GB G-Skill high speed gaming Ram/ 80 GB HDx2 + 40 GB hd/ Gigabyte Geoforce 6600GT Graphics and SB Live audio.
granpa
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 926


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2007, 04:24:17 AM »

Satelite is satelite, pretty much. It is impossible to overcome it's problems. It will always have lag.  Evil or Very Mad

Lag is not a problem with satellite but a fact.Sending a ping twice around the earth would be close to the lag of satellite and the distance involved so the shortest lag is a straight line as always. What happens is this is combined with other factors, poor aiming may be #1 but one must not forget internet traffic that nobody has control over. From one second to the next, different congestion every time, many factors apply to lag and speed variations.  shocked
Logged

Sprint EVDO A | Syntax mb/AMD 2400 - XP Pro - Home Built
Remote G11 Hughes Site Working Since 9/2001
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2007, 07:26:03 AM »

Lag is not a problem with satellite but a fact.Sending a ping twice around the earth would be close to the lag of satellite and the distance involved so the shortest lag is a straight line as always. What happens is this is combined with other factors, poor aiming may be #1 but one must not forget internet traffic that nobody has control over. From one second to the next, different congestion every time, many factors apply to lag and speed variations.  shocked

Yes but Wildblue's lag is mostly because of a new traffic shaping they are using called DAMA. Like we are talking I went to bed with high 500 to low 600ms pings and woke up with 1100 to 3000+ pings. What he was pointing out is Hughesnet actually gets better pings than Wildblue.

Pinging yahoo.com [216.109.112.135] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1153ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1263ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1612ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1247ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1167ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1180ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1201ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1286ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=2521ms TTL=47
Reply from 216.109.112.135: bytes=32 time=1210ms TTL=47

Ping statistics for 216.109.112.135:
    Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 1153ms, Maximum = 2521ms, Average = 1384ms
Logged

Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD

zeddlar
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 39


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2007, 07:38:51 AM »

Aye that is what I was trying to explain. Here is an example of my pings but keep in mind my service plan and dish because alot on the residential plans can add about 100 to 150 ms to my pings usually on Hughes.

Pinging www.yahoo.com [69.147.114.210] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=726ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=51
Reply from 69.147.114.210: bytes=32 time=706ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 69.147.114.210:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 706ms, Maximum = 726ms, Average = 711ms
Pinging www.pcpitstop.com [64.29.201.21] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=687ms TTL=236
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=704ms TTL=236
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=674ms TTL=236
Reply from 64.29.201.21: bytes=32 time=714ms TTL=236

Ping statistics for 64.29.201.21:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 674ms, Maximum = 714ms, Average = 694ms
Pinging www.testmy.net [67.18.179.85] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=769ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=677ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=708ms TTL=49
Reply from 67.18.179.85: bytes=32 time=698ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 67.18.179.85:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 677ms, Maximum = 769ms, Average = 713ms

Sorry I couldnt for the life of me remember how to set up a long ping string so I just did 3 short ones. That is what I get 24/7 and have since I switched back but I see alot of pings from other peeps on hughes residential plans with the smaller disthat run from 800 to 1000 ms pings with their avrages running usually close to 850 to 900.

Also please note that I am not saying Hughes is better than wildblue any longer. Most Hughes customers no longer see peak time slowdowns either anymore and thus get their package speeds or close usually and the pings are better and they have the new fap free time but at the same rate Wildblue is cheaper, gets very good speeds as well and has a higher fap limit stretched out over the rolling month which makes it a bit easier on some. And both have rotten customer service or used to anyhow if you are using wildblue and not coops. If you using coops you just got an unfair advantage  2funny 2funny J/K.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2007, 07:45:40 AM by zeddlar » Logged

Hughesnet small buissness package/ HN7000S Modem/ .98 dish and 2 watt Radio/ AMC9 (83w.)/ Computer specs, AMD Athlon 64 3000+/ 2GB G-Skill high speed gaming Ram/ 80 GB HDx2 + 40 GB hd/ Gigabyte Geoforce 6600GT Graphics and SB Live audio.
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2007, 07:50:43 AM »

I'm using a co-op. evil6
Logged

Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD

Print  Pages 1 Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  Wildblue Communications, Inc  |  Topic: New Satillite Speed? « previous next »
Jump to:  

    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 
 

 

© 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.145 seconds with 49 queries.