High Ping - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

  



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : uglystupid2 Don't look stupid, make sure you keep up-to-date with our rules, please read rules, click here  police January 07, 2009, 08:33:43 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  AT&T  |  BellSouth  |  Topic: High Ping Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
   Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan		     Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Topic Tools Search this topic
 Pages 1 2  All Go Down
Author
Topic: High Ping  (Read 4574 times)
Oleg25
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« on: June 09, 2007, 07:09:28 PM »
I am having problems with my DSL 3.0 service speed tests are good,but it takes too long to get reply to the server I have even changed DNS did not help. BellSouth keeps telling me my connection Is fine  angry

* grapher.gif (19.71 KB, 445x205 - viewed 94 times.)
Logged
0lie
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 28


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2007, 08:23:07 PM »
how did u test ur ping?
Logged
Oleg25
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2007, 08:27:40 PM »
Quote from: 0lie on June 09, 2007, 08:23:07 PM
how did u test ur ping?
I have test it on dslreports.com
Logged
fattymcbluff
News Anchor
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 770


pepsi >coke


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2007, 08:32:22 PM »
if that graph is your pings to dslreports then thats not that high
Logged


Oleg25
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2007, 08:42:18 PM »
Quote from: fattymcbluff on June 09, 2007, 08:32:22 PM
if that graph is your pings to dslreports then thats not that high
No the test work by sending a ping from dslreports to my IP.
Logged
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2007, 08:51:41 PM »
Trying doing this. Go Start/Run/Type: cmd/Click Ok/In the window type: ping google.com -n 25/push enter/After the test is done right click the window and hit "select all."/Then push ctrl and c at the same time/Then come back here and paste the results.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
Oleg25
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2007, 09:01:32 PM »
Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\Oleg>ping google.com -n 25

Pinging google.com [72.14.207.99] with 32 bytes of data:

Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=241
Reply from 72.14.207.99: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=241

Ping statistics for 72.14.207.99:
    Packets: Sent = 25, Received = 25, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 66ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 68ms
Logged
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2007, 09:18:32 PM »
Those pings are well within the norm for DSL. The consistency of the pings are excellent also.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
Oleg25
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2007, 09:26:47 PM »
Normal ping should be around 35-50ms.
Logged
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2007, 09:34:38 PM »
Quote from: Oleg25 on June 09, 2007, 09:26:47 PM
Normal ping should be around 35-50ms.

Some people see those results. But the odds that you are going to get them to do anything to get them that low is slim to none. I mostly see people with pings more like yours. I have been fighting the latency battle with my sat provider. Lots of ---> tickedoff with no results. My pings average in the 1300ms range and they claim that this is fine. Anyone back on topic. I don't really think that you will be able to get those kind of ping times out of them. I guess it might be worth a try...
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
Oleg25
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 09, 2007, 09:41:22 PM »
Sat pings are much higher than DSL,but 1300ms Is too high you should be In the range of at least 75ms with sat connection and you are right ISPs don't care about latency and it also depends on speed connection If you have like 756k sat connection your latency about right  smiley
Logged
fattymcbluff
News Anchor
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 770


pepsi >coke


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: June 09, 2007, 09:44:46 PM »
umm no 1300 is a avrg for sat
Logged


Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: June 09, 2007, 09:45:33 PM »
Quote from: Oleg25 on June 09, 2007, 09:41:22 PM
Sat pings are much higher than DSL,but 1300ms Is too high you should be In the range of at least 75ms with sat connection and you are right ISPs don't care about latency and it also depends on speed connection If you have like 756k sat connection your latency about right  smiley

Well actually more around the 600-700ms range, but anyway I don't wanna pull your post off topic with my same old sob story Ive had for months Shocked lol. Anyway good luck and hope you can get something out of them.

Quote from: fattymcbluff on June 09, 2007, 09:44:46 PM
umm no 1300 is a avrg for sat
It is average right now. Back before they put in a new BS traffic shaping scheme though I had pings average in high 500s to low 600s.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2007, 09:56:19 PM by Siryak » Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
php
Vice Admin
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5128



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2007, 09:56:06 PM »
Quote from: Siryak on June 09, 2007, 09:45:33 PM
Well actually more around the 600-700ms range, but anyway I don't wanna pull your post off topic with my same old sob story Ive had for months Shocked lol. Anyway good luck and hope you can get something out of them.

well, 600-700ms is about the minimum that's even physically possible with no congestion whatsoever... 1000 to 1500 is a much more realistic figure for satellite
Logged
Siryak
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 559


I didn't do it!!!


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: June 09, 2007, 09:57:37 PM »
Quote from: php on June 09, 2007, 09:56:06 PM
well, 600-700ms is about the minimum that's even physically possible with no congestion whatsoever... 1000 to 1500 is a much more realistic figure for satellite

I'm going to haft to disagree here...I see plenty of Hughes systems that average in the 600-700ms range and their satellites are MUCH more congested than Wildblue's.
Logged
Wildblue/Beam 40/Laredo NOC/Pro-Pack/Latency is fregin ridiculous
Windows Vista Home Premium x64
Q6600/ 4GB RAM / 9800 GT 1GB / 500GB HDD
Print  Pages 1 2  All Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  AT&T  |  BellSouth  |  Topic: High Ping « previous next »
Jump to:  

 
    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 		  

 

 © 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.113 seconds with 55 queries.