Road Runner Download Speed Boost - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : uglystupid2 Don't look stupid, make sure you keep up-to-date with our rules, please read rules, click here  police October 13, 2008, 09:55:12 PM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  RoadRunner (Time Warner Cable)  |  Topic: Road Runner Download Speed Boost Advanced search
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 2 3 All Go Down
Author
Topic: Road Runner Download Speed Boost  (Read 19109 times)
richcornucopia
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1877


View Profile
« on: January 26, 2005, 07:10:28 PM »

I have confirmation that the RR upgrade will be in effect as of January 31st for all RR customers. This will bump the basic RR from 3Mbs-5Mbs(375kbs-625kbs) but no change to the upload speed as of yet, I also have just found out the premium service will also be upgraded from 6Mbs to 8Mbs (750kbs-1000kbs) as with the basic service there will be no upload speed change. 5mbs/384kbs for 45 bucks is a very reasonable price for broadband, and those looking for a little more speed should get the premium service because 8mbs/512kbs for 69.95 is a great deal. Just thought I'd give you all an update on the RR upgrade situation, because up until now I had no idea the premium service would be upgraded, and the time warner rep I spoke with said the upload speeds would be upgraded soon.
Logged
JustinOhioRR
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 479


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2005, 07:28:56 PM »

lol your a little late.....already posted about it..........

i already got my update and its nice. Smile
Logged

DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 2195


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2005, 07:42:17 PM »

When the rep said the upload will get upgraded,did he mean for the premium service or for both?
Logged

richcornucopia
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1877


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2005, 08:35:54 PM »

He said they were first working on getting the download speeds upgraded for everyone, and that the next priority would be the upload speeds for everyone. Unfortunately I have no idea what kinda of upgrade this will be, hopefully a big one and soon  Very Happy
Logged
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 2195


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2005, 09:00:54 PM »

Nice Very Happy
And most likely its probably gonna happen in NY first,just like the download upgrade ;)
Logged

richcornucopia
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1877


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2005, 09:12:05 PM »

Yea,too bad I'm not in Ny...
Logged
DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 2195


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2005, 09:14:35 PM »

I am evil6
But thanks for the info Very Happy
Logged

richcornucopia
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1877


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2005, 09:17:06 PM »

no problem
Logged
JustinOhioRR
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 479


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2005, 11:52:58 AM »

Hell, I'd be happy with a 768 upload...........but wouldn't a 1.5 upload just RULE? lol.......
Logged

DJ VaGGo
Trance <~> Energy
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 2195


Earthlink 10000/512


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2005, 11:57:24 AM »

Hell, I'd be happy with a 768 upload...........but wouldn't a 1.5 upload just RULE? lol.......

Definitely Twisted Evil evil6
Logged

Planatoid
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 05, 2005, 01:09:40 AM »

Heck, I'd reather have a higher upload than a download, so much more useful.
Logged
☻ ◦§1 ☺
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3751


= Red VS Blue =


View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: February 05, 2005, 08:18:15 AM »

Heck, I'd reather have a higher upload than a download, so much more useful.

Agreed. id trade my 5/386 ( getting about 5500/360 )   fir 1/2  or   1.5 /2  anyday Smile
Logged

*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 5.01Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s

Download Connection is:: 21252 Kbps about 21.25 Mbps Download Speed is:: 2594 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 4440 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps Upload Speed is:: 542 kB/s


I F1NAL I
Global Moderator
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1784


CHSI


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 05, 2005, 10:45:23 AM »

Same Here. Very Happy
Logged

wingzero2309
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 972

Confucius say...You go to jail bad boy!


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2005, 05:53:22 PM »

i think upload and download speeds should be equal

For example...RR ppl get 5Mbps download right now, so we should get 5Mbps upload too Very Happy

if only the world was perfect... Smile
Logged


☻ ◦§1 ☺
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3751


= Red VS Blue =


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2005, 08:27:54 PM »

5/5 would be pushing it hardcore lol.  I say we should have the option of the current (5/386)  or somethign like 2/2 for the same price. I can live with 250 kbs (RMS) ^  and v   Smile
Logged

*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 5.01Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s

Download Connection is:: 21252 Kbps about 21.25 Mbps Download Speed is:: 2594 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 4440 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps Upload Speed is:: 542 kB/s


I F1NAL I
Global Moderator
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1784


CHSI


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 07, 2005, 09:23:19 PM »

In my opinion i think all ISP's should atleast give 1.5Mb upload. Now that would be nice. Smile
Logged

JustinOhioRR
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 479


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 08, 2005, 12:13:50 AM »

RR  should be 5/1.5.........or even 5/768 id be happy...........40k/second upload isnt S#!t anymore.......
Logged

Planatoid
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 08, 2005, 06:13:46 AM »

Does uploading hurt a cable company's lines moreso than download?  Because, when I upload at a high rate, my maximum download goes down.  But, downloading doesn't really affect my upload.  Or is this just the way they set it up?
Logged
VanBuren
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6117


Cablenut Tweaker


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 08, 2005, 06:20:55 AM »

Does uploading hurt a cable company's lines moreso than download?  Because, when I upload at a high rate, my maximum download goes down.  But, downloading doesn't really affect my upload.  Or is this just the way they set it up?
when you upload at full speed, your latency increase and if you start downloading, its hard for you to send acknowledge packets to the sender that you received the packet

i suggest you download netlimiter, and set your maximal upload speed to 90% of your cap

www.netlimiter.com

then your download will speed up abit, but Cable is also half duplex and that means you cant send and receive at the very same time.

VanBuren Smile
Logged

☻ ◦§1 ☺
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3751


= Red VS Blue =


View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: February 08, 2005, 07:15:22 AM »

RR should be 5/1.5.........or even 5/768 id be happy...........40k/second upload isnt S#!t anymore.......

lol nah.  768 up isnt realy all that great anymore either...  80 kB/s up ?  I think that 1 or 2 up would be much better because you transfer things to people and places at high rates , meaning that itnwould take MUCH less time, meaning you wouldnt need to use the upload for a long period of time like we do now with 40 kbs :rolleyes2:
Logged

*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 5.01Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s

Download Connection is:: 21252 Kbps about 21.25 Mbps Download Speed is:: 2594 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 4440 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps Upload Speed is:: 542 kB/s


JustinOhioRR
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 479


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 13, 2005, 01:20:09 PM »

lol nah.  768 up isnt realy all that great anymore either...  80 kB/s up ?  I think that 1 or 2 up would be much better because you transfer things to people and places at high rates , meaning that itnwould take MUCH less time, meaning you wouldnt need to use the upload for a long period of time like we do now with 40 kbs :rolleyes2:

bro....lol im being reasonable here...........do you know how much bandwidth is for a company? not cheap........

neawys.....it owuld be nice........but im not greedy (unlike someone else!!!) lol...........
hell even 512 would be an improvment but not enuff..........i say 5/768 and if your greedy 5/2 but then they would have to lower the price to compete with Verizon FIOS.......which is never gonna happen........just my thoughts........bitch  angry5 angry5
Logged

philp
Guest
« Reply #21 on: February 13, 2005, 10:17:47 PM »

What I find funny is that if everyone had 3 meg uploads, we'd all want 4. It's never enough with us, is it?  :haha:  :haha:
Logged
Planatoid
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 121



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2005, 12:13:07 AM »

Ehh, there's enough.  I could do with 768Kbps no problem.  384Kbps is just too dang slow, I can't stand it.  With 768Kbps you could run a decent gaming server without uploads, that's all I care about.
Logged
☻ ◦§1 ☺
Vice Admin
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 3751


= Red VS Blue =


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: February 26, 2005, 10:14:40 AM »

bro....lol im being reasonable here...........do you know how much bandwidth is for a company? not cheap........

neawys.....it owuld be nice........but im not greedy (unlike someone else!!!) lol...........
hell even 512 would be an improvment but not enuff..........i say 5/768 and if your greedy 5/2 but then they would have to lower the price to compete with Verizon FIOS.......which is never gonna happen........just my thoughts........bitch angry5 angry5

Bandwidth isnt that expensive at all. Not for the companies. Look at verizon, and look at non-us ISP's. In japan 25 million homes will be equiped with full 100/100 connections by the end of 2005. Bandwidth is not expensive, ISP's are greedy.  2/2 3/3 isnt S#!t for the isp. Thats a 1/10th of what business's use.
Logged

*~ Member Since: September 20, 2004 ~*
running 10s outbound test (client to server) . . . . . 5.01Mb/s
running 10s inbound test (server to client) . . . . . . 20.62Mb/s

Download Connection is:: 21252 Kbps about 21.25 Mbps Download Speed is:: 2594 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 4440 Kbps about 4.4 Mbps Upload Speed is:: 542 kB/s


Neocorteqz
Earning Trust
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4


View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: May 14, 2005, 08:52:23 PM »

I'd be very happy with at least 768 up with the 5 mbit service, 384 is just too damn slow.
Logged

moonlancer
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 42

who said you cant go fast?


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: May 15, 2005, 12:14:26 PM »

::::::::::.. Download Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 4752 Kbps about 4.8 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Download Speed is:: 580 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (main)
Test Time:: Sun May 15 14:13:52 PDT 2005
Bottom Line:: 85X faster than 56K 1MB download in 1.77 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 23.88 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-B6MW5XPTU


::::::::::.. Upload Stats ..::::::::::
Connection is:: 363 Kbps about 0.4 Mbps (tested with 579 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 44 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net/ (prem)
Test Time:: Sun May 15 14:03:15 PDT 2005
Bottom Line:: 6X faster than 56K 1MB upload in 23.27 sec
Diagnosis: Awesome! 20% + : 29.18 % faster than the average for host (rr.com)
Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-FWJUC8MBQ
Logged
Stupendous Man!
Earning Trust
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2007, 10:21:45 PM »

I have confirmation that the RR upgrade will be in effect as of January 31st for all RR customers. This will bump the basic RR from 3Mbs-5Mbs(375kbs-625kbs) but no change to the upload speed as of yet, I also have just found out the premium service will also be upgraded from 6Mbs to 8Mbs (750kbs-1000kbs) as with the basic service there will be no upload speed change. 5mbs/384kbs for 45 bucks is a very reasonable price for broadband, and those looking for a little more speed should get the premium service because 8mbs/512kbs for 69.95 is a great deal. Just thought I'd give you all an update on the RR upgrade situation, because up until now I had no idea the premium service would be upgraded, and the time warner rep I spoke with said the upload speeds would be upgraded soon.

richcornucopia you're obviously knowledgeable about speeds but you're careless.  "Mbs" and "kbs" mean absolutely nothing.  In the case of your post you have mistaken "Mbs" for the actual term"Mbps" standing for "Mega bits per second" and "kbs" for the actual term "KBs"

Your numbers are accurate if you make these replacements.
BUT for all you speed weenies who want to sound intelligent next time you open your mouth at a lan party here are the facts.

bits SUCK, likewise so did technology in the 70's I mean come on, the first cell phone was the size of a backpack.  At the time transfer speeds were being developed the speeds were all measured in bits/second (don't confuse bits/s with baud it's a common misconception but they are not always equal)

computers are extremely powerful now and have enormous capacities.  Your computer (I assume most reading this are running some version of windows) shows you all your files in KB, MB and GB and some crazy dude might have a file that says TB.  These are "Bytes" Kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera, respectively

1 Byte = 8 bits
8000 bits = 1000 Bytes = 1 KB

We do everything on computers in the Kilo, and Mega Byte range.  Luckily some idiot decided that data transfer rates, LAN, WAN, Serial blah blah, should be measured in bits.  GREAT IDEA!!  Anyway no sense in arguing, what's screwed up is screwed up.

So your lovely cable/dsl/dialup providers give you these pretty numbers in Kbps or Mbps.  and here is the easiest part.  If you learned to add in 1st grade you can calculate what the rates are actually moving at so that it is relative to an MP3.. Because last time I checked nobody said here just grab my three-million three-hundred twenty-five thousand ninehundred twenty-five bit MP3.  NO.. he said here it's just under 3 Mega Bytes

Cable provider says you get 768Kbps, sounds good.  Well lets check

768 Kilo bits per second = 768,000 bits per second
Divide 768,000 by 8 to get how many Bytes... = 96000 Bytes
and 96000 divided by 1000 (Kilo) = 96 Kilo Bytes or 96KB WOW

or I could cheat and see that it's already in Kilo bits and divide by 8

768/8 = 96KB  By todays High speed standards, that sucks.  11 seconds or so a MB that's 30-40 seconds for a 3 min MP3

Okay a tricky one for that math wiz

3Mbps okay I like to use the tricks of the trade.  rather than convert a bunch of times make the Mega into Kilo and divide by our crafty bit -> Byte conversion.

3Mbps = 3000Kbps
3000Kbps/8 bits = 375KB

There we go now we get our 3 min MP3 in 10 -15 seconds

Okay well you get the idea.  don't make mistakes with your "B" = Bytes and your "b" = bits and you'll feel good. 
 
If anyone made it to here I applaud you for listening to my rambling.  I Hope I made someone smarter and the dumb more confused.  Good Day.
Logged

Stupendous Man!
mudmanc4
Global Moderator
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4301





View Profile
« Reply #27 on: February 06, 2007, 06:01:28 AM »

  Welcome to the forum  Stupenoud Man!
  BTW , pretty good, explanation, and I'm am not sure yet if I am the dumb one or just the confused. azn   AAR, you clarified this for me in an understandable manner . Thanks
Logged

Macbook Pro  Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz     GeForce 8600M GT 256 MB PCIe Quartz Extreme
 4 GB Crucial 667 MHz DDR2 SD Ram    160 GB @ 1.5 GB BW SATA HDD
 L2 cache 4 MB  Bus speed~800 MHz     rEFIt ~  Leopard 10.5.5 / Boot camp/parallells/Vista Ultimate


In confusion there is profit
wingzero2309
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 972

Confucius say...You go to jail bad boy!


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: February 25, 2007, 11:36:57 AM »

richcornucopia you're obviously knowledgeable about speeds but you're careless.  "Mbs" and "kbs" mean absolutely nothing.  In the case of your post you have mistaken "Mbs" for the actual term"Mbps" standing for "Mega bits per second" and "kbs" for the actual term "KBs"

Y