Cable/DOCSIS guru question - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : angel Do you think your good enough to write news for testmy.net?  Shoot me a PM and you may be accepted to write for us, a title of nobility Smile November 22, 2008, 11:19:03 AM
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  Comcast Cable Communications  |  Topic: Cable/DOCSIS guru question Advanced search

Recommended Tests

Click here to run a free Performance Scan
  Test PC Performance:
     Click here to run a free Performance Scan
    Test PC Stability:
     Click here to run a free Registry Scan


Note: The links above are sponsored links
  0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 Go Down
Author
Topic: Cable/DOCSIS guru question  (Read 2161 times)
Frankydp
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 18


View Profile
« on: August 04, 2007, 01:51:49 PM »

Alrighty i have a question.

Is there a proportionate relationship between upload and download speed when dealing with DOCSIS or cable internet, and the reason I ask this is because if there is it seems to be disproportionate to each other.   I understand the idea of pipe capacity and no I not a cable infrastructure guru. 
Example:
I carry the following standalone speeds.
Up 70-80 KiloBytes
Down 900-1200 KiloBytes
Spelling it out to avoid confusion.

Scenario:
If my uploads exceed say 15 KB then my downloads are directly effected by a 600-700 KB cut. How does that work? If they total pipe size is somewhere around 1300KB why would an upload limit my download by 600-700KB. 

Possible issues:
Local machine configuration
DOCSIS
Comcast configuration

Machine:
Vista Ult x64
Marvel Yukon 88E8001 Ethernet Controller
Nvidia nforce net controller
Comcast with top tier


Any ideas?
 
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 6563 Kbps about 6.56 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 801 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 1500 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 183 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/11/25 - 1:30pm
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-K8ISUAFN1
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-N4X7MY9CZ
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9
mudmanc4
Global Moderator
TMN Sr. Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 4471





View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2007, 02:09:10 PM »

 I'm no guru on the subject either, but I did find a nice clip that could lead you to your answer.

Quote
DOCSIS specifies downstream traffic transfer rates between 27 and 36 Mbps over a radio frequency (RF) path in the 50 MHz to 750+ MHz range, and upstream traffic tranfer rates between 320 Kbps and 10 Mbps over a RF path between 5 and 42 MHz. But, because data over cable travels on a shared loop, individuals will see tranfer rates drop as more users gain access.

http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/D/DOCSIS.html
Logged

Yea, it's a Mac

In confusion there is profit
Swimmer
Vice Admin
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6393



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 04, 2007, 02:56:01 PM »

huh... that is a really good question.. I don't have the exact technical answer.. but my guess would be that the modem is configured in such a way, through the configuration file that Comcast pushes out, that when you begin to get above 15KB for upload it begin allocating more bandwidth to the upload side of things... The only way to do this would be to pull bandwidth from either bandwidth you are not using or from bandwidth that you are currently using for downloads..   I am sure that there is some type of magic overall bandwidth limit that is set for each individual user/package that prevent you from downloading/uploading at the same time at your max connection speeds.
Logged

Frankydp
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 18


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2007, 08:11:19 PM »

My main concern is that the reallocation of bandwidth is disproportionate to the consumption of said bandwidth by the upload.
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 6563 Kbps about 6.56 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 801 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 1500 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 183 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/11/25 - 1:30pm
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-K8ISUAFN1
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-N4X7MY9CZ
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9
bryanlautt
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 386


You think like one, You become one!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2007, 03:34:11 AM »

I all boils down to weather your on Cable or DSL or Sat, all major Networks are all shared so thats why its seems to be proven that there are less people up at night surfing and downloading then they are during the day.  I always get alot better speeds at off peek hours.

Logged




Unthrottled/768K
keetan
Full Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 68

I've never had an original thought in my life.


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 05, 2007, 03:46:38 AM »

That's an excellent question.

It really comes down to mathematics. Too much brain crunching for me to compile, but mudmanc4's quote is very true. This also depends on how many people are on the node, how healthy the mobo cards are in the node per upstream snr levels, time of day (peak/non peak).

This used to be a large issue when cable internet evolved. There was only so much bandwidth to go around, only so many nodes...

Now that the speeds are more than sufficient to handle the media rich websites, the average (non gamer I might add) won't notice or call their local tech support. The only issues now that are being resolved are overcrowded nodes. Once you hit about 600 people on a given node, you can expect some issues.

Cable operators are in the process of thier yearly projects. Upgrading frequencies and also laying more fiber alongside coax to support the load. They'll be called E.O.N. or P.O.N.    E- Meaning Extenable. P- Meaning Passive O.N. Meaning Optical Network. They'll be 'splicing' and 'sweeping' nodes. Some places will double to alleviate crowding. San Diego already has most of thier stuff in place. Any place you can figure they have E.O.D. "On Demand" for cable television, they're ready.

That's a whole nother story.  Hope that strikes interest.
Logged

:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
CPU: Mac mini Core Duo -Superdrive
T2300 @1.66GHz 1.67GHz
Mem: 2.027GB DDR2 5300 Dual-channel
OS: WinXp Pro
Modem: D-Link DCM-202 rev.1 (modded)
Router: Linksys WRT120N -(DD-wrt)

dn0
Expert
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1179


Finally Football Season


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 05, 2007, 07:30:04 AM »

Scenario:
If my uploads exceed say 15 KB then my downloads are directly effected by a 600-700 KB cut. How does that work? If they total pipe size is somewhere around 1300KB why would an upload limit my download by 600-700KB. 

Maybe a duplex mismatch?
I have never tested my downloads while uploading something at the same time.
There would also be some processor usage issues, but your machine looks pretty quick.

Try the test at http://netspeed.stanford.edu/ and look at the duplex test results.
Logged


Download Connection is:: 13858 Kbps about 13.86 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB) Download Speed is:: 1692 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 1052 Kbps about 1.1 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB) Upload Speed is:: 128 kB/s
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-3H8V14MSA
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-FT5ZNJCXB
Frankydp
New Member
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 18


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 05, 2007, 12:51:10 PM »

Some interesting results maybe.

Normal duplex operation found.
OS data: Name = Windows Vista, Architecture = x86, Version = 6.0

1. Going to have to read up on duplex.
2. I am running an x64 arc.


So I have been digging and digging for the same issue on many many sites.  And I think you are on to something when you talk about the handling of large amounts of packet generation and deconstruction by the CPU.  The dual core AMD is notorious for having this exact issue in servers but my problem is that their is no "cpu driver" for vista x64.  And the only driver for the dual core amd processor is a Microsoft maintained one which is not good because MS is extremely !fast. So any other ideas or comments would be welcomed.

And Keetan, did not mean to ignore your post but I have check my true bandwidth and nod capacity and I am in a newer area and share my node with maybe 50 homes max.  And i have this same disproportionate relationship in peak and off peak. 

Question.  I guess if i really wanted an answer to my question I could dual boot this box with longhorn server/2008 and see what happens then i could officially call it the vista driver problem?
« Last Edit: August 05, 2007, 12:57:16 PM by Frankydp » Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 6563 Kbps about 6.56 Mbps (tested with 5983 kB)
Download Speed is:: 801 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 1500 Kbps about 1.5 Mbps (tested with 2992 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 183 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/11/25 - 1:30pm
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-K8ISUAFN1
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-N4X7MY9CZ
User Agent:: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9
Print  Pages 1 Go Up
testmy.net Broadband  |  Provider Discussion and Reviews  |  North American Providers (Including Canada)  |  Comcast Cable Communications  |  Topic: Cable/DOCSIS guru question « previous next »
Jump to:  

    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 
 

 

© 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.113 seconds with 40 queries.