Wanting to build a new pc, gaming, computing, everything - testmy.net resource / tool
Home
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

 



donations help testmy.net pay for the very high cost to run the site. Any amount is greatly appreciated.
Click to read why...

  spcr
    
News : smitten remember, testmy.net loves you!  Show your love back and tell your friends about our great community!  We rely 100% on word of mouth advertising, so if you find that the site is useful, tell a friend!  ~ Thanks!  cheesy July 08, 2008, 09:49:27 PM
testmy.net broadband community  |  Main Forum  |  Online Gaming Discussion  |  Topic: Wanting to build a new pc, gaming, computing, everything Advanced search
  0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages 1 2  All Go Down
Author
Topic: Wanting to build a new pc, gaming, computing, everything  (Read 3013 times)
GIXXERGUY6
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


View Profile
« on: December 18, 2007, 09:07:26 PM »

I was wanting a quad core 2.4 with gigs and gig of ram with a nice 512 gfx card, but I was told by a guy I talk to regularly at the local pc shop that the quad cores run hot and only use 2 of the cores 80% of the time so the other 2 are sitting there. he said everything is written around single and dual core.

so my question is do I build a quad core with 8 gig ram and a kickass gfx card with sli capabilities and wait for programming to catch up to it?

or do i build like a dual core 3.0 with 4-8gig ram?

I play a couple online games, and I like moving files around, downloading, gfx and some video editing.

fill me in guys
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 12828 Kbps about 12.83 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1566 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 718 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 88 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/09/01 - 11:17am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-UTSR5NB4O
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-OHFQ01P2Y
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
starship_troopers
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2078


Darkness follows me no matter what I do...


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2007, 09:30:56 PM »

unless you play alot of online games, like crysis and stuff. and alot of hardcore video editing and stuff, youd otn need a quad core...hell get one and wait if you want, but im perfectly fine not even maxxing out my dual core 5600+ amd cpu.  and why get 8gigs of ram? 3 or 4 would be enough...if you really want alot i'd get 3GB...4 is overkill for most stuff...  and yeh its true about the quad cores.  Smile
Logged

ok, its gone
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 9444

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2007, 07:43:03 AM »

What the guy told you is wrong.

Quad core processors don't just use 2 cores 80% of the time. If you are using vista it will balance the load on all 4 cores 100% of the time. If you use XP forget about it, it will never balance the load because its not threaded for quad core of even dual core.

about 99% of programs are written for single core and that will just about never change because most apps don't need to be threaded. Only things like Photoshop, Premier Pro, 3D Max, etc. need to be. With vista you can have 4 apps open and it will use a processor for each app, you do not have to worry that its not threaded.

Quad Cores don't run that hot. I have a Mac Pro here with 2 quad core xeon processors and it runs cooler then some dual core systems. I have a dual xeon dell here as well and it runs cooler then that as well.

But with what you are going to do, (unless your talking HD video) you don't need a quad core, save the money and get a core 2 duo.

You also don't need anything close to 8GB of ram. Go with a max of 4. and do it in 2, 2GB sticks so you can upgrade later.
Logged

GIXXERGUY6
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2007, 01:03:46 AM »

well it looks like a quad core 2.4 with 4 gig to start and 8 gig i the future for the 64 os i have to upgrade to.  dual 512mb geforce 8600gt's 1000w ps a decent case with temp readouts, extra bays. I have yet to figure out what cooling option i want to go with. I'll have 1-3 120mm case fans, and a huge one for the cpu as well.

sound good lol.

might upgrade to a killer nic card as well in the future.
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 12828 Kbps about 12.83 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1566 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 718 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 88 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/09/01 - 11:17am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-UTSR5NB4O
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-OHFQ01P2Y
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
starship_troopers
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2078


Darkness follows me no matter what I do...


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2007, 12:21:01 PM »

ok...but do killer NIC cards really do that much to be worth the extra $$$
Logged

ok, its gone
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 9444

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2007, 12:39:51 PM »

ok...but do killer NIC cards really do that much to be worth the extra $$$

Nope
Logged

starship_troopers
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2078


Darkness follows me no matter what I do...


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2007, 12:51:00 PM »

thanks dlewis...i didnt think so. just makin sure.  Wink
Logged

ok, its gone
GIXXERGUY6
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2007, 01:20:51 PM »

they say they do. I don't know. but for 250 they better do something lol
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 12828 Kbps about 12.83 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1566 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 718 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 88 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/09/01 - 11:17am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-UTSR5NB4O
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-OHFQ01P2Y
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
GIXXERGUY6
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2007, 01:54:16 PM »

Nope

how do you know this?

if you set it up right i assume it would do alot..or am I assuming wrong?

i don't know

less lag, ping, sounds awfly good
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 12828 Kbps about 12.83 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1566 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 718 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 88 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/09/01 - 11:17am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-UTSR5NB4O
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-OHFQ01P2Y
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
starship_troopers
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2078


Darkness follows me no matter what I do...


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 21, 2007, 02:28:32 PM »

i think you should just get a normal nic ...and tweak yoru connection...the killer nic is wayy to expensive...with no actual proof
Logged

ok, its gone
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 9444

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: December 21, 2007, 02:32:48 PM »

how do you know this?

if you set it up right i assume it would do alot..or am I assuming wrong?

i don't know

less lag, ping, sounds awfly good

you spend $220 on a nic so you can have a few MS shaved off your ping time, big deal. How about you just join a server thats closer to you.

It doesn't make that big of a difference in your ping time. If you have a good solid connection with a good upload and download speed, this nic is then a complete waste of money
Logged

GIXXERGUY6
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: December 21, 2007, 02:36:23 PM »

you spend $220 on a nic so you can have a few MS shaved off your ping time, big deal. How about you just join a server thats closer to you.

It doesn't make that big of a difference in your ping time. If you have a good solid connection with a good upload and download speed, this nic is then a complete waste of money

I'm not saying I'm going to get it. I've been looking it over lol.

anyone know of  good nic card to get other than the onboards or generics?
Logged

::::::::::.. testmy.net test results ..::::::::::
Download Connection is:: 12828 Kbps about 12.83 Mbps (tested with 12160 kB)
Download Speed is:: 1566 kB/s
Upload Connection is:: 718 Kbps about 0.7 Mbps (tested with 1496 kB)
Upload Speed is:: 88 kB/s
Tested From:: http://testmy.net (Main)
Test Time:: 2007/09/01 - 11:17am
D-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-UTSR5NB4O
U-Validation Link:: http://testmy.net/stats/id-OHFQ01P2Y
User Agent:: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; Maxthon; Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1) ; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
dlewis23
Global Moderator
TMN Seasoned Veteran
*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 9444

HEY! ill put it down when im good and ready.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2007, 02:38:20 PM »

I'm not saying I'm going to get it. I've been looking it over lol.

anyone know of  good nic card to get other than the onboards or generics?

Since its all done on your processor it doesn't matter which one you get.

Nic's are all just about the same.
Logged

RTB
Dead but Alive
Global Moderator
TMN Veteran
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2052


I'm so evil, I'm hiding half my face from you.


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: December 21, 2007, 03:49:24 PM »

well it looks like a quad core 2.4 with 4 gig to start and 8 gig i the future for the 64 os i have to upgrade to.  dual 512mb geforce 8600gt's 1000w ps a decent case with temp readouts, extra bays. I have yet to figure out what cooling option i want to go with. I'll have 1-3 120mm case fans, and a huge one for the cpu as well.
I sure hope you don't mean the 8600GT cards, they don't benefit from the added memory at all, because they can't handle the resolutions where the added memory is of use. A popular and useful combination is 2x HD3870 or 2x HD3850, because getting the 8800GT is quite hard to get currently (although the AMD cards are also getting more rare). Also, a 1000 watt PSU is plain overkill and generally has a lower efficiency at the wattage levels you'll be reaching with that setup. A 600W PSU from a well-known brand will be a much better and probably cheaper choice.

Unless you can find one which doesn't make the CPU do all the math, stick to on-board. The killer NIC does this, but is waaaay too expensive. It has other purposes.
Logged

<scud> The other day, in the park, I was wondering why frisbees look bigger and bigger as they get closer to you
<scud> And then it hit me

Click me. Or be diminished; one by one.
fattymcbluff
TMN Friend
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 712


I will kill you!!!!!


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: December 21, 2007, 04:01:28 PM »

I sure hope you don't mean the 8600GT cards, they don't benefit from the added memory at all, because they can't handle the resolutions where the added memory is of use. A popular and useful combination is 2x HD3870 or 2x HD3850, because getting the 8800GT is quite hard to get currently (although the AMD cards are also getting more rare). Also, a 1000 watt PSU is plain overkill and generally has a lower efficiency at the wattage levels you'll be reaching with that setup. A 600W PSU from a well-known brand will be a much better and probably cheaper choice.

Unless you can find one which doesn't make the CPU do all the math, stick to on-board. The killer NIC does this, but is waaaay too expensive. It has other purposes.
what are you talking about 8800gt hard to get and amd cards more rare?
Logged

Print  Pages 1 2  All Go Up
testmy.net broadband community  |  Main Forum  |  Online Gaming Discussion  |  Topic: Wanting to build a new pc, gaming, computing, everything « previous next »
Jump to:  

    
testmy.net's forum is proudly Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Bookmark: Del.icio.us    StumbleUpon
 
 

 

© 1999-2008 testmy.net - Contact - Legal - Facts & FAQs
Page Loading Stats: This forum Page created in 0.119 seconds with 52 queries.